mark248 Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 so, wat about THESE guys? artillery is very useful, in defense AND offense so, umm, lol, y werent they included? was there not enuff room or sumthing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bromley Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 Seriously mate. Engage brain before posting. Look at the average size of an artillery formation. I have no idea, but I suspect that it has to be a lot less than 50k men. Then look at the hex size. Got any idea how big those hexes are? No, neither do I, but you'd lose the entire Allied artillery in just one of them. Then think about the range implications - either they have hugely unrealisitic ranges or they have to go toe to toe with frontline infantry units to engage them. Anyway, they're incorporated in the existant army and corps (and probably tank) formations. As they would have been in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 They're included, of course AT technology would be Artillery guns that kill Tanks. Tanks are mobile artillery of sorts. we have Rocket artillery, why? Cause it's neat. Artillery for the game, could turn out bad. A unit stack with Artillery might work for a bonus, but in a much more detailed game. I thought one of you guys said that 90% of casaulties of WW2 were Artillery? So hmmm, why not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kantabricus Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 http://www.bullrunofvermont.com/wwii.htm Draw your own conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts