Jump to content

Russian APBC Slope Effects


Recommended Posts

I have posted a drawing on the following site that illustrates the impact and slope effect differences between AP, APC, APCBC and APBC when they strike 60° slope armor:

http://musee-des-blindes.intranets.com/login.asp?link=

Sign in as a guest, go to discussions, armor and projectiles, and the 122mm charts and high angle slope effects thread. The post will be the tenth on the thread, and the .gif file is attached.

At 60° and T/D=0.8, APBC and APCBC slope effects are about 5% different (APBC is lower), and AP is much higher.

At 60° and T/D=0.49, APBC slope effect is much lower than AP, and AP is lower than APCBC.

[ 07-15-2001: Message edited by: rexford ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discussions with Nathan Okun on Russian APBC resulted in the following notes:

1. Russian APBC may be an attempt to gain the advantages of an armor piercing cap without the actual cap

2. Flat nose APBC may be more vulnerable to shatter, and may be less effective than APCBCC against face-hardened armor at vertical

3. Rounds without noses are often more effective on highly angled hits due to the energy that noses absorb and use going through the armor

What data is out there, particularly in Jentz, regarding penetration ranges for 76.2mm T34 hits on PzKpfw III and IV?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...