Jump to content

OT to FAT32 or not?


Guest Bloodlust

Recommended Posts

Guest Bloodlust

just been reading my win98 manuel while waiting for pbem and it suggests converting hard drive to fat32 says it runs faster and more efficiently

does it indeed do this? (only concerned with games speed)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloodlust:

It does make your system run more effeciently by making better use of Hard Drive space. I converted mine as soon as I could.

The only problem I noticed is that defrag takes much longer to do its work. I use a Dell Dimension L400 with a Celeron Chip running at 400Mhz with 128Megs of Ram.

------------------

Webmaster

http://www.trailblazersww2.org

http://www.vmfa251.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, HD access of large files will be slower on fat 32 because the cluster size is only 4k - meaning that the drive will have access up to 8x more clusters to read the same file compared to fat16.

Don't convert unless you are really running out of space.

The major drawback with fat16 is cluster sizes once you go over 511 MB - they are MUCH larger than fat32, so if you have lots of little < 32k files on your HD they will take up heaps of space (eg minimum size of 16k or 32k even if the file itself is only 1k!)

Other major issue is that FAT16 only supports up to 2048k partitions, meaning that if you have a large HD you'll have to make multiple partitions if you want to stick to FAT16.

So if you've got a fast system with a large HD, stick with fat32 (which is normally installed by default I believe), but if you want better HD performance then FAT 16 is the way to go.

Cheers, Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...