Lets End the "Non existant rivalery," between CC and CM

[Guest Lord General MB]

Sirs,

Lets get this out on the table once and for all! Pros and Cons, reasons what not... ect. I'll kick this off:

CC (Since its 2D) has a nicer and smother res then CM, and because of this CC can show KIA, WIA, and full squads. That something CC can do and CM can't.

------------------

Cheers,

Lord General Mr. Bill,

1st Army

[Cybeq]

I don't even think of CC as a wargame. If you want to compare somthing worth comparing then compare CM to SPWAW. At least they are both turn based. Real-time sucks if you want a good wargaming experience.

------------------

"To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence." -Sun Tzu, The Art Of War

[Slapdragon]

My Hamsters will not even play CC. Pfui!

[Guest Lord General MB]

Sirs,

Dam your Hamster fodder!

No I think CM blows away CC, I'm just giving CC a betting chance since it just gets trashed here.

------------------

Cheers,

Lord General Mr. Bill,

1st Army

[Bombardier]

You’re comparing apples and oranges.

You can literary complete any CC campaign in one day once you discover the “tricks”.

It is hardly a challenge and certainly not a simulation.

Once again I find myself praising the work BTS has done.

[Slapdragon]

My Hamsters and Nutria will defeat your meesly rodents!

,,,,,,

( QjQ )

\----/

I

__ I ___

I

I

Digital Self Portrait

[Guest Lord General MB]

Soldier

Bombardier, If you noticed the tittle...

"Non existant rivalery" it's becasue they ARE apples and oranges. There both good games, that are TOTTALY oppiste each other but people just want to now which one comes out on top... it's CM of course, but CC has its good parts.

------------------

Cheers,

Lord General Mr. Bill,

1st Army

[Guest MantaRay]

If you want to end the debate, why start another brainless thread about it? Think people, think.

Ray

[Guest Lord General MB]

Sir,

I'm hoping to blow off any last steam thats left to debate about this issue.

------------------

Cheers,

Lord General Mr. Bill,

1st Army

[Guest Big Time Software]

Well gents, as well meaning as this thread might be, it usually grinds itself up into a big mess. So I am going to put in a few words here and then close it up...

I think the *only* thing that can be compared between the two games (more or less imperically) is the degree of realism each achieves. Almost everything else is either subjective (like which is more fun) or not comparable (like what one can do graphically vs. the other).

Bottom line is the two games don't really compete. They are escentially very different games and only somewhat related by genre (i.e. both are WWII, but that is about all). So no need to compare

Steve