Jump to content
Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips

GS_Hinkel

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    31

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

 Content Type 

Posts posted by GS_Hinkel

    Questions about new 'British' screenshots

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    yeah thanks for clearing me up yank smile.gif

    but i still wouldnt consider around 500m as 'long' range

    btw @ the Brit... i told you something wrong about the cam moovments

    the cam isnt restricted sry 4 that

    i made soem screens of the hitchances smile.gif

    the hitchance of a PAK43/41 with APCBC

    http://rapidshare.com/files/16654709/APCBC.JPG.html

    the hitchance of a PAK43/41 with APCR

    http://rapidshare.com/files/16654916/APCR.JPG.html

    the hitchance of a Pak43/41 with HEAT

    http://rapidshare.com/files/16655001/HEAT.JPG.html

    hope you can open em smile.gif

    [ February 15, 2007, 03:28 PM: Message edited by: GS_Hinkel ]

    0

    Questions about new 'British' screenshots

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    @ yankee dog.. i think you confused something there smile.gif

    thungsten IE Wolfram or stuff like that is heavyer than steel and not lighter smile.gif

    btw the drop isnt that dramatic but from like 20-30% to around 10%

    and the drop is at all ranges exept you have such a high hitchance that it doesnt matter if its APCR or AP

    oh and btw the ground attack planes all have HE loaded so theyr nearly absolutley useless against midwar light-medium-heavy tanks

    the Ai in the planes has a priority anyways

    first AP guns then infantry/tanks

    one thing i also noticed was that the KV1E is a bit buggy

    i never got any obvious penetration...

    either the model is buggy that it shows penetrations or the armoursystem of the tank is buggy

    like getting hit by 6 APCR shots of a 50mm pak @ around 90° @ 200m at the side

    or 2 Pz4H 1Pz4F2 1 Panther 1 Hetzer and 1 Stug3G shooting at a Kv1 @ around 150-200m and NO seeable penetration

    im not saying it cant be penetrated... but it somehow is tuffer than a tiger and can absorbe shots it normally would be destroyed by then

    0

    Questions about new 'British' screenshots

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    Originally posted by theBrit:

    I thought I'd post this here to keep the update thread clear.

    Good find!

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Flanker15:

    Here's an odditty:

    In this screen:

    http://www.battlefront.com/products/tow/screenshots2/pages/ww2%202007-02-03%2016-03-49-92.html

    The 37mm gun has a much lower velocity and penetration.

    But in this screen:

    http://www.battlefront.com/products/tow/screenshots2/pages/ww2%202007-02-03%2016-05-18-61.html

    It's almost twice as fast and much better at beating armor! I don't understand!

    Wait I see that it has a 1937 shell in the first screen and 35 in the second but they are both AP so why the big difference and wouldn't a later AP shell be better not worse?

    Ok I figured it out the Shell Mle is for HE rounds and Shot Mle is AP but that dosn't explain why it has a AP icon in the loaded shell indicator.

    </font>
    0

    changes in the BF edition

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    ok thanks for the fast answer

    but about the tiger and panther discussion ^^

    panther had better FA and weaker side and rear armour

    the 75mm of the panther had better penetration on most ranges

    so imo i consider the panther to be a better tank becuase its the better combination of fikrepower, armour and speed

    0

    changes in the BF edition

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    ok guys.. after playing the russian version some time... i really hope BF does some AI changes

    like bazookas hitting at 250 meters (checked the distance) repeatly (every shot hits)

    also what seems a bit odd are the penetrations that occure

    it seems like the angle the armour is doesnt really count

    the panther has 80mm armour eh?

    well it seems like it 80mm @ 0° and not 55°

    that counts for all tanks ive been playing with

    on the other hand why the hell have my tanks a hit chance of 100% with APC @ 500 meters and only a hitchance of 50% with APCR?

    i really dont understand that

    all in all the Tiger is (in the game) better than the Panther because it's better armoured (in the game)

    as a last note: the game really plays well in early war but its getting more buggy and buggy the later the campaign goes

    0

    TOW graphics quality ?

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    hmmm just as a sidenote...

    you dont want a game wif super duper über gfx like CoH with the maps, calculation and things like that

    because you would have like 2-3 fps

    even with a 1337 10000$ pc you wont be able to run 4x4 KM maps with top of the notch gfx

    you can choose

    ubergfx and arcardey gameplay

    or realism and good gfx

    0

    Question regarding infantry.

    in Theatre of War

    Posted

    sry guys i just mistyped

    also @ kecks just because i registered in august of 2006 doesnt mean i didnt play CM or CC

    in fact i love playing CM2+3 and CC2-5 (well more kinda CM) and im still playing it

    you guys should be mature enough to not bash and flame someone just because he sayd somethign wrong

    ....

    0
×
×
  • Create New...