Jump to content

GS_Hinkel

Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

About GS_Hinkel

  • Birthday 03/01/1988

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.GermanSoldiers.com

Converted

  • Location
    Linz, Austria
  • Interests
    gaming

GS_Hinkel's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

0

Reputation

  1. yeah thanks for clearing me up yank but i still wouldnt consider around 500m as 'long' range btw @ the Brit... i told you something wrong about the cam moovments the cam isnt restricted sry 4 that i made soem screens of the hitchances the hitchance of a PAK43/41 with APCBC http://rapidshare.com/files/16654709/APCBC.JPG.html the hitchance of a PAK43/41 with APCR http://rapidshare.com/files/16654916/APCR.JPG.html the hitchance of a Pak43/41 with HEAT http://rapidshare.com/files/16655001/HEAT.JPG.html hope you can open em [ February 15, 2007, 03:28 PM: Message edited by: GS_Hinkel ]
  2. @ yankee dog.. i think you confused something there thungsten IE Wolfram or stuff like that is heavyer than steel and not lighter btw the drop isnt that dramatic but from like 20-30% to around 10% and the drop is at all ranges exept you have such a high hitchance that it doesnt matter if its APCR or AP oh and btw the ground attack planes all have HE loaded so theyr nearly absolutley useless against midwar light-medium-heavy tanks the Ai in the planes has a priority anyways first AP guns then infantry/tanks one thing i also noticed was that the KV1E is a bit buggy i never got any obvious penetration... either the model is buggy that it shows penetrations or the armoursystem of the tank is buggy like getting hit by 6 APCR shots of a 50mm pak @ around 90° @ 200m at the side or 2 Pz4H 1Pz4F2 1 Panther 1 Hetzer and 1 Stug3G shooting at a Kv1 @ around 150-200m and NO seeable penetration im not saying it cant be penetrated... but it somehow is tuffer than a tiger and can absorbe shots it normally would be destroyed by then
  3. oh btw guys buildings can be knocked down... one or 2 big shells are enough to blow a house into pieces
  4. ok thanks for the fast answer but about the tiger and panther discussion ^^ panther had better FA and weaker side and rear armour the 75mm of the panther had better penetration on most ranges so imo i consider the panther to be a better tank becuase its the better combination of fikrepower, armour and speed
  5. ok guys.. after playing the russian version some time... i really hope BF does some AI changes like bazookas hitting at 250 meters (checked the distance) repeatly (every shot hits) also what seems a bit odd are the penetrations that occure it seems like the angle the armour is doesnt really count the panther has 80mm armour eh? well it seems like it 80mm @ 0° and not 55° that counts for all tanks ive been playing with on the other hand why the hell have my tanks a hit chance of 100% with APC @ 500 meters and only a hitchance of 50% with APCR? i really dont understand that all in all the Tiger is (in the game) better than the Panther because it's better armoured (in the game) as a last note: the game really plays well in early war but its getting more buggy and buggy the later the campaign goes
  6. wünsche man kann noch so oft den namen wechseln deine unreife schreibweise und art jeden zu beleidigen wird man sofort erkennen
  7. @ Wünsche wie dumm muss man sein um sich auf so ein asoziales nivo zu begeben?
  8. @ Markus86 um sonst isser ja net von GS gekickt worden ^^
  9. nice to see that the nazi music has been changed
  10. oh noes neo-nazi music in the second vid :X!
  11. hmmm cant watch the second vid it tells me that the file cant be found first vid works great
×
×
  • Create New...