Fußball
-
Posts
196 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Fußball
-
-
You must not know how to read. As I have stated already once before. The only claim to historical accuracy I made was concerning the PzGr40. ( panzergranate40 ) The tungsten APCR round and that it was readily available during 1941.Originally posted by Andreas:You were the one who brought up historical accuracy. If you are not interested in it, why bring it up? If you are interested in it, why do you think that an elaboration on it is not needed?
I never asked you to tell me how many PaK38s there were in a division. If I were citing how many PzGr40 shells were produced during 1941 and I were incorrect maybe then you could have corrected me.
I really do not want to repeat myself a third time. So please, while you are thinking of ways to make me look foolish, learn how to read. Now stop making yourself look like a fool on the internet and cease your senseless arguement.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
You seem to not understand very well what I am saying. You can compare and contrast on combat reports all day and read accounts of men and the like as much as you want.Originally posted by Andreas:This post is utter nonsense. We can well know if someone exaggerated, lied, or told the truth. E.g. without having been there, I feel confident to state that Hans Seidemann lied or exaggerated, and certainly did not tell the truth, on the matter of Bruno Meyer's air attack at Kursk.
But no matter how much information you have compiled you still do not know what indeed did happen at that particular moment in time. Maybe just maybe you have formed a good hypothesis or a good idea of what happened. But you do not know because you were never there.
It is not so much that I would not believe JasonC because he is analytical. It is more because I would not believe JasonC because he is a bigot. Give me someone who will analyze the matter in question, not someone who will write it off as incorrect because it differs from his own thoughts or beliefs.Originally posted by Andreas:Your comparison between Otto Carius and JasonC is also non-sensical. Carius was a participant relating first-hand information from the lowest level. JasonC is an analyst looking at a large range of sources and looking at things from a higher level. If you say you'd rather believe Carius than JasonC, then all you say is that you are not interested in analysis.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Need it be? I was just adressing ways to counter the KW-I in a situation involving the PaK38. There was no need to state how many PaK38s were alotted to each division in response to my post.Originally posted by Andreas:I did not think your post was particularly clear, or helpful in term of historical accuracy, so I filled in the background to address its deficiencies.
The focus of my post was not about historical accuracy save the comment of PzGr40 being readily available in 1941. Your comment, however correct it may be, was not needed as a response to my own.Originally posted by Andreas:Maybe you somehow misconstrued that as me saying that your post was factually inaccurate. Which it was not, it just completely failed to address the most important problem, if one considers historical accuracy.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
I was pointing out ways to use the PaK38 against the KW-I if need be. It is not as if I was stating that the PaK38 was the most numerous antitank cannon in service during 1941.Originally posted by Andreas:Pak38 is nice, but not a realistic option, and does not qualify for historically accurate.
Unless somehow you misconstrued me stating that,"Historically in 1941 there were enough Tungsten, PzGr40, rounds to go around." as me saying historically there were plenty of PaK38s to go around. Which I was not.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
The point to these arguements being that you either believe one side's reports or another's. Or maybe even a mix of both. It is really up to the reader to choose. You could stay indifferent and be skeptical or you could believe either or. I highly doubt anyone on these forums has actually crewed a Tiger or a T34.
In JasonC's case he probably daydreams of T34/85 drives and tea time with Pappa Stalin. If you want information from a Russian biased point of view go to him for your information. He has plenty of it.
If you want information from a German stand point there are many excellent sources. Tigers in Combat I & II are two very great books. They are exactly what you need if you need combat reports and/or specific Tiger unit information. Written by Oberst Wolfgang Schneider. These two books give very detailed combat information on the units that deployed the Tiger I and Tiger II.
Do remember that ultimately it is up to the reader to decide whether or not he believes the author's words are truth or lies. The only true way to have known what happened was to have been there and experienced it firsthand. And I personally would believe Otto Carius over JasonC anyday.
Whether Otto Carius or Mikhail Gregorievich Reznikov exaggerated, lied, or told the truth we will never truly know because we are neither of the aforementioned persons.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
PaK38s will clean KW-I tanks up nicely as long as you have them within 300m. Historically in 1941 there were enough Tungsten, PzGr40, rounds to go around. So with the PzGr40 you have a much needed punch to keep KW-I tanks out to distances in excess of 600m. Just keep these factors in mind when you face KWs again.
Also note that while you may not be able to KO enemy KWs; you can, however, scare the inexperienced crews into abandoning their tank. Enough partial penitrations and the crew will bail. More often than not shelling the tank enough will shake up an inexperienced crew to the point of bailing.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Tschüß, scumbag !!! :mad: :mad: :mad:Originally posted by Prinz Eugen_2:Tschüß, maggot !
-
Of course when the landsers on the front get the stielgranate 41, close engagements with the PaK36 get risky!Originally posted by Stalin's Organist:Of course - it even gives the 37's something useful to do rather than just die!!
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Don't forget to roll in with 3,7 PaK36 and make short work of them! Of course T26s will be good against infantry with no real AT capabilities.Originally posted by Stalin's Organist:Try fighting against them with "ordinary" 1941 German infantry - no demo charges, no molotovs, no magnetic mines, no grenade bundles.
Suddenly that 15mm armour becomes rather useful!
Obsolete tanks are just so fun to use. It is like the underdog in a one-sided fight!Originally posted by Vixen:I love junk tank fights or junk tank vs infantry fights. Lot of fun!
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Nice WIP on the M3 Mikey. Have fun on your vacation, well deserved I should say. You know how we have to butter you up ya' know.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Thanks for that. I will check it out.Originally posted by David I:Erich,
The only one I know of for Italy is "Pat's Roofs" which change the roofing from wood shingle to clay tile. A must have in my opinion.
DavidI
Tschüß!
Erich
-
I would never do that/touch that with a 3 meter pole you pitiful excuse of a living human being. :mad: :mad: :mad: Eat rectum slime, scumbag! :mad: :mad: :mad:Originally posted by Prinz Eugen_2:Are you gonna throw me a setup from the The Christmas Battle downloadable from Boots and Tracks, and selecting whether to play as the courageous Soviets or the despicable pasta-eatinh surrender monkeys ?
Tschüß!
Erich
-
My, what trash we have here today. It is too bad no game wants to take the realistic route anymore. All games have nowadays is the new-fangled graphics and sh*tty gameplay. O well, does not matter. I have CM!
Tschüß!
Erich
-
O really? Looks like when I get the chance I will have to take a gander at these pretties.Originally posted by MikeyD:For you Brumbaroholics, If you haven't got this already (long ago) you might want to download Pat's 'PATMIKEYDCHASSISPATCHES' on the CMAK side of cmmods.com. In it are default Brumbar side art using my from-scratch PzIV suspension. Makes all the difference in the world.
I already seen the photos. I was referring to MikeyD making a Brummbär mod. Thanks anyway though.Originally posted by MeatEtr:I guess the pics aren't showing up for you. Try disabling your internet security, if you have any.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
I am guessing by "some open topped german crap vehicle" it was a Marder. At least lets hope it was not a Nashorn... It does not help your situation any if the Marder crew had higher experience than your T34 crew. And also the Marder's ableit narrow optics are somewhat superior to the average Soviet optics. Depending on the situation the Marder crew would have seen your T34 before your T34 crew seen the Marder.
As previously stated hiding may have helped. Since a vehicle "hiding" simulates something more along the lines of turning the engine off and keeping things quiet. So if your T34 had been "hidden" it may have made a vehicle? or more detailed contact and then you could have reacted.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Ja, I think so too. </font>Originally posted by Prinz Eugen_2:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fußball:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Prinz Eugen_2:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fußball:
Because I think I did.
-
Speaking of buildings. I have torn through cmmods.com only to find no Italian building mods, shack, light or even small heavy buildings. Has anyone by chance made any *non* Normandy Italian building mods but have not uploaded them/has them stored elsewhere?
Thanks in advance.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
One would say...Originally posted by John Kettler:Let's say that there's a BIG difference between "R.I.P." and "W.I.P."
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Ja, I think so too. :mad: :mad: :mad: </font>Originally posted by Prinz Eugen_2:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fußball:
Because I think I did.
-
I will send you side shots myself of the M24 Chaffee as long as you get one out! For some reason the vanilla M24 Chaffee is a golden color. I have never bothered making a scenario with the M24 because of just that. It would turn off my CM mood quite easily watching my tanks chase a golden M24 around the map...if not a bit humorous.
Brummbär? Where?Originally posted by MeatEtr:HE-chucker BearTschüß!
Erich
-
Play during early late 1942 or early 1943 with a Tiger and see if you can lose.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
5cm PaK38 will also do the trick at close ranges. Also if you are playing versus the computer that is even more testament to why the KW-I is a monster. The computer cannot simulate any effective tactics to counteract your monster unless the opponent's tank just so happens to be within effective range to penitrate your KW-I. In any situation where the computer cannot penitrate your tank's armor it will reverse/use smoke and reverse.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
It is always humorous when enemy soldiers surrender and then decide,"Maybe this is not such a good idea?" and unsurrender. I have had one particular MG surrender to one of my squads firing at it, then unsurrender only to have my squad resume firing at the MG and then the MG surrendered again but getting mowed down by fire from my squad.
Tschüß!
Erich
-
Very nice work on the M3. Not many mods for American equipment sadly. M24 Chaffee anyone?
I cannot wait until more Panther mods come out. There is a startlingly low seclection on the Ausf. A & G models in both CMBB and CMAK at the moment. Hopefully we can get MikeyD to do something about this....Originally posted by Vergeltungswaffe:If these frightened you the most, then Panthers will be a breeze afterwards.
Tschüß!
Erich
Captured Russian tank modeling
in Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
Posted
The only complaint I have about the captured T34s is that they do not contain a radio when they should. I am geussing that maybe BFC used the same data sheet for the captured T34 as the Russian T34 maybe?
Tschüß!
Erich