Bastich

Exactly. You would speak differrent about wars if you were involved in any. You maybe will be angry you loose it. You may be happy you won it. You may get some of your close people killed. You know. I don't expect from you or anyone else to understand it my way. I expect to understand it in any way other than "Oh, shut up".

Dude, you are going off-topic here. I saw that picture before. Sad thing. I will just say that Croats who fled from the Serbian territories on the beggining of the war didn't have tractors. Just plastic bags. Victims are victims. And nothing remains the same after the war. Same for the Serbs, Muslims and Croats. And for media and different interpretations (especially of the numbers, which are easy to manipulate), I will just say that everyone has their agenda. I have mine, you got yours.

I haven't asked for your condolence. But it is ok, if it got no cheap irony attached to it. I think that you are pulling things out of context: Prove me wrong, but you said to the original poster that there is lack of complaining about Nazi Tanks compared to complaining about Serbian tanks? Bad choice of words. I could never tell that war I was involved in was bigger, better or worse, more important war than anybody else's war. Comparing one war with another so ligthly as you is privilege of people never touched by war personally. That is where I drew my "stupid" statement. Then my judgement wasn't false, after all.

From your point of view it seems that one side there was pure victims. And the rest of Europe wrongly sees all of you as killers and rapists. Which is a common things to all sides which lost the war. But don't you think you see things too one-sided? Truth is somewhere in between, as always. BTW, picture link is dead.

When you make a statement where you pass judgement on others on whether they have been in a war or not purely on their views about evil, yes it is stupid. </font>

No, it bothers me because it's a stupid thing to say. [/QB]

Well I have talked quite a few veterans too and read quite a few books. All pretty much agree with me. So why don't you wise up and stop being spokesperson for people who haven't given you that title? </font>

Don't you just love people who make such stupid conclusions as this? But hey, I can make them too: People who think that "people who can say that the greatest evil ever lived on earth are Nazis, have never been in a real war" have obviously not read their history books nor talked to WW2 veterans or Jews. </font>

Everyone can have their opinion about war based on their experience. People who can say which tanks were "greater evil" (Which is the criteria for measuring evil?) or that games based on real events are pure fiction, fortunately for them, obviously don't have any real war experience at all. But that doesn't bother me much. I'm passionate war gamer, and I really like to have choice of sides(i.e. Axis and Allies). This often adds additional depth to the game. IMHO, Call of Duty would be better with playable Axis in the single mode. In this case it should be said that both sides used almost the same weaponry (tanks, guns, planes) and that it was not too hard to implement other side into game. Disclaimer: While set during a real-world conflict, this game is not intended as a political statement or to imply any support of the various factions involved. The Yugoslavian civil war has been, typically for civil wars, a bloody and violent struggle which left no side innocent, cost civilian lives on both sides, and in which there rarely was a “right” or “wrong” side. But there obviously are "our" and "their" side. Or at least "sympatethic enough to portray in game" and "not sympatethic enough to portray in game" side. What more describes real attitude of developers in this case, words in disclaimer or content of the game, judge for yourself.