BigRed1

I know there as been mutiple discussions on this topic before, but, I just had to reply somewhere & express my fusturation & maybe inquire of the talented people at Battlefront if there is strictly a buisness decision or one political correctness or both. I guess my fusturation is that if was straight buisness decision based on the fact that do to the PC sensitivity that could come with the Module I might be able to understand it a little, but not much. Strictly from a gaming perspective, we all play & enjoy the initial release that pits American military forces causing causulties to Syrian Forces / Insurgents / Terrorist forces & vice-a-versa. Now I have friends that are American & they are not offended over this. I am sure as great of a Series as this, I wonder if there are any players of Middle Eastern descent that play the game & do not have issues with how the combatants are potrayed. Now we have British forces (Excellent Module by the way) added to the mix & this does not appear to have had any terrible moral debate on whether this Module should have been produced. Nato is next, I would hope to see possibly a Warsaw Pact / Cold War Module (Personal Opinion). To get to my point is what would be wrong in doing a IDF Module say combined with a Eygyptian / Syrian forces to smulate the 1967 & Yom Kippur War Module? I guess I could be called to simplistic but to historcaly recreate & simulate some of the largest tank battles since WW II, I just can not see that being a bad thing, regardless of if your American, British, or of Middle Eastern descent, etc.

Is there ever any chance that there would be a Israeli Module?