My question is really more of a strategic question than a tactical question.
It just seems to me that if the Axis delay Barbarossa to the last possible moment and use the intervening time to build up tech as well as air/tank forces and HQ's on the East Front, there is little the Allies can do.
One way to delay the USSR's entry is to not attack many neutrals. This alone buys you a two to four turn delay in a USSR DOW. Or put in simpler terms - 2 Tech advances + 1500 MPP's!
Questions:
Do experienced players consider this a gamey strategy?
If yes, what house rules do you recommend to mitigate the use/effectiveness of this strategy?
If not, does anyone else use this strategy?
If so, what are your experiences with this strategy?
I started Barbarossa in April 42 with +3 Air, +2 Range, +1 Tanks, +5 Industry for the Germans and +2 Industry and +1 Ships for the Italians. Is this typical or was I "lucky" with the Tech advances?
Having played often enough, I know what the Russian positions are going to be at the beginning of the Axis Invasion of Russia. I am able to pre-position my units so that I can take Odessa and Tallinin (the Baltic City?) on my first turn in Russia. I finish off all the first line Russian Armies by the end of my second turn.
About the only thing I can think of is Allies may want to just disband those front line Armies and trade them for Corps to be deployed and entrenched further back?
[ October 16, 2002, 09:02 AM: Message edited by: aaa ]