Jump to content

Esquire

Members
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Esquire

  1. I have to date kept away from the on going debates about fun vs accuracy. I find this product in its current form to be very entertaining. Where is the line drawn on historical accuracy? To be 100% historicaly accurate would mean that the game is lost from the onset as the Axis player, What fun is that? Jets in 1942? Interesting but not so much fun as a long term campaign. I enjoy the strategic aspect of the game, not the rush to victory. Remember the goal in chess is to capture the King, not slaughter your opponents pieces. Oh well, just a thought.

  2. As I was laying siege to Moscow my children were behind me watching Nickelodeon. When I was about to enter the city i thought to myself, "why not change the name", so I entered the Soviet capital with my elite crack shock troops know as the "Sponge Bob Corps".

  3. I was a little surprised myself. You could not believe the shock when I witnessed my poor little Rom. Buddies get blastde by the Soviet Navy. As I was in no position to expand the war into Turkey, I just had to sit there and take it. I think in some edition down the road the player should be able to use their foreign policy ie. money, to influence other countries in order to get them to join in the war.

  4. The only difference I noticed was that when the Low countries fell the French and Brits. did not immediatly withdraw to Paris. They stayed one full turn at the front, then withdrew. Paris fell at the beginning of August 1940. The difference I did notice was that for the life of me I could not take Yugo. I had 4 air fleets, 3 armor,and 2 Inf. and it would not fall.

×
×
  • Create New...