Jump to content

Egan

Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Egan

  1. I think I actually prefer CMAK to BB. There may be less extremely powerful units than in the last game but i don't think it makes it any less fun.

    One of the reasons I like CMAK more is that one of my fathers friends who died recently was the intelligence officer of the 5th Seaforth Highlanders,( Part of the Highland Division,) and wrote a book called 'Battalion,' about the fighting he was involved in. The game will give me a chance to recreate some of the battles out of it.

    On top of this i think there is something about commanding British troops that I like more than eastern front stuff. Believe me, there are a LOT of interesting battles that can be recreated.

  2. I was much the same at first, thinking that as I didn't know as much about the Eastern front I probably wouldn't enjoy the game as much as CMBO. Boy, was I wrong!

    Since before I got the game I started reading a fair bit about it all and I think there is a certain terrible romantisism about the Eastern front,It's difficult to read accounts of Stalingrad, for example, without thinking something of the bravery of ordinary men an woman living and fighting in conditions that can truly be called horrific.

    For me, I have gained more and more respect for those who fought and died in this war since buying the game. I even have a better understanding of the war in this theatre since buying it, and I thinks thats something pretty special for a computer game.

  3. I think most of it has already been said..

    1: Relative spotting

    2: I think dynamic lighting would be kinda cool

    3: More terrain types and doodads, like more building types, fountains and haystacks, that sort of nonsense.

    4: Improved AI (although i'd imagine this is a given anyway,)

    and last of all, a campaign system of some sort.

  4. I had an infantry company one time that got one hell of a shellacking from russian heavy mortars .

    the withdraw command was the only thing that saved them from getting slaughtered. I only ended up with three units getting routed which i thought was acceptable considering i couldn't affords to lose a full company. used at the right time, like all other commands, it can be invaluable. the thing is to know when to use it.

  5. Ah! Thanks guys, I had never seen the term Landser before, I thought it was some sort of eastern front thing.

    On the subject of the SS, I don't think they were ever part of the regular army were they? I remember reading that Himmler retained control of the Entire SS - Waffen or not. There was a big bit in the the book " Order of the Deathshead," about this..? it suggests that although they basically acted and worked with regular army they still came under Himmler's control.

    Actually, there is a bit in the same book which talks about Himmlers SS fantasy. He decided that after the war was over he would create an SS state in Burgandy and rule over it. He wanted to recreate the sort of mini kingdoms that had been created by the tuetonic knights and suchlike. I had never heard this before, He was A total nutter!

    [ November 23, 2002, 01:40 PM: Message edited by: Egan ]

  6. I've just been reading 'The forgotten soldier,' by Guy Seger,(I think that's his name,) and he keeps describing himself and the army in general as 'Landser,'

    Does anyone know what this meens and can anyone tell me what the difference is between Wermacht, Heer and Landser?

    is it just a term used on the eastern front as i've never seen it anywhere else before?

    Inquiring minds want to know!

×
×
  • Create New...