Jump to content

Swift

Members
  • Posts

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Swift

  1. I agree that we need a better guide on how C2 works. I totally disagree with it being removed. The "imaginary links of communication" are one of the best features of the game as it removes "borg spotting" and adds friendly fire to the game.

    However I think it needs to be tweaked or debugged. As it is now units in a vehicle might have better intel then the vehicle (and that is with a team member in the commanders seat).

  2. I am ok with a scenario that is not designed with the purpose of giving the player a fair chance to win (although I am not saying that this is the case here).

    At least in the campaign it feels more "real" when you have to start a scenario without the knowledge that you have a good chance of making it. Sometimes the Syrians have to have a good day to smile.gif

  3. I have seen some comments on the Javelin that calims that it has a thermobaric warhead (or that there are versions of it that does). In such case the Javelin's smaller size warhead could very well stack up to a larger "standard" explosive warhead like a artillery grenade. As to the size of the crater that it leaves I am not sure as it detonates above ground and not below (like a shell).

    The Russians have a thermabaric RPG called RPO-A Shmel that claims to have the same effect as a 152mm artillery round and it has a 2kg wharhead (compared to the Javelins 8kg)

  4. I liked this scenario. But then again I did not replay it to win. I trashed the BMPs and then ran straight into the tanks. Managed to some of them before running out of missiles (they took out the AT strykers fast).

    In the end I managed to kill two tanks with the use of a mk 19 stryker (the reactive armour makes for a nice show when hit by 4-5 grenades) and a single AT4 shot. As a reward my units got bombed by the Apatches (I called them in on my position but why can't the air support attack intelligently? I mean they do know the difference of a stryker and a tank don't they?)

  5. I know you have been busy but if you have time to make a list of known bugs it would help. As I don't have detailed knowledge of the weapons in the game it's hard to know when 2-3 missiles miss a target if it is due to a bug or if they just are inaccurate.

    (That or detailed information on how all weapons in the game works ;) )

  6. Well, they stated that they aim for two weeks after 1.02. You can't get a more precise date as they obviously have not made it yet and thus don't know what kind of problems they run into.

    The current patch rate is excellent btw considering that they have a very small staff.

  7. I just noticed that it moved at all. You should be far to interested in pressing the buttons to start the game then to look at graphics smile.gif

    Oh, and thanks for a game that not only (at least on my computer) starts and loads your saved game fast without the otherwise common startup delays but also alt-tabs fast and quits in an instant (boss-key)!

  8. I just noticed that it moved at all. You should be far to interested in pressing the buttons to start the game then to look at graphics smile.gif

    Oh, and thanks for a game that not only (at least on my computer) starts and loads your saved game fast without the otherwise common startup delays but also alt-tabs fast and quits in an instant (boss-key)!

  9. I just noticed that it moved at all. You should be far to interested in pressing the buttons to start the game then to look at graphics smile.gif

    Oh, and thanks for a game that not only (at least on my computer) starts and loads your saved game fast without the otherwise common startup delays but also alt-tabs fast and quits in an instant (boss-key)!

  10. I currently play the campaign on Veteran level and I am curious how spotting works.

    In the "High Points, Low Points" scenario I have a platoon of Bradley's carrying scout units. I noticed that the unit that spotted the most enemy contacts where the buttoned scout unit.

    How come? Would not the Bradley have better vision then a soldier inside it?

×
×
  • Create New...