Hi all,
Firstly, as a first time poster (lurker?) I'd like to congratulate all those guys/gals that make this such a great board to visit. But like many 'lurkers', if I don't have anything to add, I don't say anything....
This topic caught my eye though. Well said Abbott, I think that sums it up. It's a bit like true courage...it is my opion that those that are truely 'sh*t' scared when they do something extrodinary, are the true heroes.
For the record my vote goes down to the Australian / New Zealand digger. No special forces unit, just the plain old infantryman. Most historical records class them highly. Rommel considered them the elite of the Commonwealth forces. They held Tobruk and stopped the Japanese in New Guinea. In WWI they suffered the highest casualties (per capita) of any other force as they were used as 'shock troops' by the British. Now I'm pretty sure on that one, so go easy if I'm wrong . Not that I'm saying they did it with out help though...
Lastly, I'll admit it...I'm a proud Aussie...
Cheers,
John
Ohh, just read your post Stalin. Sorry mate gotta disagree there. Have a little read about The Anzac occupation of Tobruk and/or the battle of El Alemain where Aussies and New Zealanders featured heavily. Or perhaps you'd rather take Rommel's word for it . Don't quite get the bit about conscripts...
In respects to Vietnam, from what I've read the Digger used very different tactics to the GI. An example of this philosophy is seen in the service rifle of the time, a semi-auto with no auto mode based on the Belgium FN. Full auto was seen as an waste in the stealthy jungle contacts and unneccesary. But then again I wasn't there...
[ 05-01-2001: Message edited by: Gersen ]