Jump to content

Kimerik Kukka

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kimerik Kukka

  1. I prefer my software in Finnish. Not because they would be easier to use (actually sometimes switching to Finnish version causes understanding problems, terms being unfamiliar), but I like the look of Finnish when written. It's so smooth and relaxing. Also having used English in wargames for two decades I am getting bored for English expressions. Would be nice and fresh surprise to have localized version.

    BTW I think the greatest danger in translation errors lies in Russian words and names. Finnish method to transferring them to latin alphabets is somewhat different than the one that English uses. I might live with anglo style as they are sometimes in use with Finnish mass media (to my horror :eek: ).

  2. One thing to consider about guerillas and their weapon systems. A man armed with RPG would also be carrying an assault rifle. He would be effective agaist APCs and the enemy infantry. ATR armed fighter would have only minimal effectiveness agaist soft targets due to low rate of fire.

    So I would assume the manpower poor guerillas to rather use RPG/rifle platform than ATR. Overall effectivenes being much more satisfying.

    RPGs and LAWs seem to be easier to conseal than those heavy and long ATRs. Guerillas needing stealth during movement.

  3. Sometimes when making a scenario I use split infatry squads with added panzerfausts as antitank ambushing teams. Works well. 2 to 4 teams can have a total of 4 to 8 PZs. With that firepower they can take out few armour which have to be unsupported by infantry of course. If having TRP on the ambush spot artillery smoke screen will considerable help extracting the ambushers alive.

×
×
  • Create New...