Jump to content
Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips

Porajkl

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    177

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Porajkl

    (((0.091*28.82)-x)*92.736)*100 = ((7.264*100)*(41-(28.82-x)))

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rollstoy:

    :confused: "g" is a constant???

    How come?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    A long long, very long time ago Mother Earth said (after serious heated debate with Father Sun) that the "g" will be an almost constant value. It is from then on known that the "g" is around 9.81 m/s2, depending where on Mother Earth you are standing.

    But you probably speak about G-spot, which of course is not a constant!

    :D:D

    0

    (((0.091*28.82)-x)*92.736)*100 = ((7.264*100)*(41-(28.82-x)))

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Juardis:

    OK, I don't get it. You some kind of statistic geek? If you can come up with the equation, then surely you can solve the damned thing? I mean, I'm a nuclear engineer and solving equations is easy to me. Coming up with the equations is an entirely different story. If you're smart enough to come up the the equation, then you're way smarter than me.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I agree with you. I'm mechanical engineer and the hardest point in solving a problem is creating an equation to describe it. Once you have the equation, it's easy to solve it, especially easy one like this one... So, our friend must be, hmm, "different" from the rest of people. ;) He can easily put up with statistical equations but he cannot solve easy math equations with one unknown variable. Strange. :rolleyes:

    0

    Nuclear weapons in CM? (warning - large pics)

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Madmatt:

    Okay, so you saw it while you were playing but subsequent replays didnt result in the same thing? Hmm...You got that autosave still? If you do please send it to me. In a single player game each time you run the autosave it will resolve differently but there is usually some good info in there that can point to where a bug may be hiding.

    Madmatt<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I'll send it to you ASAP when I come home. Great of you to take care about our whinings smile.gif

    0

    Nuclear weapons in CM? (warning - large pics)

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    It was a battle against AI, but I couldn't reproduce these results. After this happened, I

    loaded autosave file and wanted to see if it will happen again, but it didn't. I tried once more and it still didn't happen. I guess human being is allowed to see this Holy hand granade explosion only once... But there was no vicious, cruel rabbit smile.gif Or was it somewhere in the woods? :D

    I still have the file if someone wants it, but I guess you won't have luck either.

    0

    Some sort of a..... ....bug?

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by panzerwerfer42:

    That 0 is the ammo for the .50 cal which has significantly less than the .30cal ammo which is shown on the main screen. It's fired before the .30 cal and tends run out rather quickly.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I don't think so. In case of a Sherman tank that would be true - it has divided ammo in detail screen (I think it's 50 for .50 cal and a lot more for .30). But here in halftrack the ammo is counted together, so the gunner always shoots with both machineguns. 250 is total ammo for both machineguns, no matter which one he uses, so he cannot run out of ammo just for .50. And even if your comment would be right, why I couldn't issue a fire command? The HT was undamaged, the picture was taken on the first turn of a battle.

    0

    Some sort of a..... ....bug?

    in Combat Mission Archive #3 (2001)

    Posted

    Is this some kind of a bug? Ammo for this HT is on the bottom "250" and on the detailed view "0". How can be this possible? And the halftrack cannot fire. So the zero is correct, but why is on the bottom 250?

    This picture has been captured on the beggining of scenario "Snowmen", by the way.

    2001-9-4-12-31-41-3044.jpg

    [ 10-04-2001: Message edited by: Porajkl ]

    0

    OP Sea Lion

    in Combat Mission Archive #4 (2002)

    Posted

    If you win against human... God praise you! :D

    I will not ruin your game, no spoilers from me. Just one thing - I also thought that it will all be easy as in the first battle... Yes, I also think you must advance enough to win, but how to do it? As I said, it's just too much men and too little time... And good luck!

    0

    OP Sea Lion

    in Combat Mission Archive #4 (2002)

    Posted

    Has anyone played operation Sea Lion as German and beat the allies? I know I'm not a great attacker, but hey, I inflicted 3-4 times more casualties and same factor for destroyed vehicles (practically all were tanks - a lot of points), but allies had a TOTAL VICTORY... :mad:

    I know I should advance more, but single battles are only 15 turns and I could advance in only first 6-8 turns, afterwards I had to fend off swarms of allied tanks and infantry. Is it possible to win this OP? Anyone?

    0
×
×
  • Create New...