Jump to content

Red Dog

Members
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Red Dog

  1. For those who don't know, that was the parachute and glider drop made by the SS 500th para battalion to capture Tito (Yugoslavian partisan leader) in May 1944.

    Before I go through all the trouble of working on this, has anyone already done this battle?

    If not, anyone know of a good source of maps for Drvar and the surrounding area?

    I've tried searching, but all I can find are political maps.

    I think this will make for a very challenging battle.

  2. For those who don't know, that was the parachute and glider drop by the SS 500th para battalion to capture Tito (Yugoslavian partisan leader).

    Before I go through all the trouble of working on this, has anyone already done this battle?

    If not, anyone know of a good source of maps for Drvar and the surrounding area?

    I've tried searching, but all I can find are political maps.

  3. Originally posted by JonS:

    Hmm. Since you wouldn't take the hint ...

    Those Divs were near full strength, due to replacements. The quality of the replacements is another matter. Perhaps of more moment for the current discussion is that the 5th FJ was nowhere near the northern flank of the offensive. The 3rd was in the area, but was part of the main offensive and walked everywhere. The SS Para Bn and the Brandenburgers weren't involved in the drop either.

    http://www.eagle19.freeserve.co.uk/ardennes.htm

    Regards

    JonS

    Going to have to dig out my books this weekend and reread up on this operation...

    Weren't the SS Para Bn and the Brandenburgers dropped in under the command of Otto Skorzeny?

  4. Originally posted by FM Paul Heinrik:

    I wasn't aware or forgot that German paras made a drop during the Battle of the Bulge. That took some balls to do. Seems like it would be a suicide mission due to allied air superiority.

    That's why they dropped at night. In addition, the weather was pretty bad as well. These factors combined with the inexperienced pilots were a major factor in the failure of the operation.

    Who knows how the Battle of the Bulge would have turned out if the entire force had dropped near the rally point and secured the crossroads...

  5. Originally posted by Alech:

    But no drops in Russia, right? I was under the impression that they functioned as "elite" infantry in Russia.

    Now, other then StuGs, what sort of AFVs would you see supporting them?

    -Alech

    I'm not sure if Yugoslavia is considered to be part of the eastern front, but you can certainly recreate the Drvar Campaign with CMBB.

    As for other AFVs or vehicles in general, it would all depend on what other units were nearby and what they could be assigned from the Corp or Army HQ that they were attached to.

  6. Originally posted by JonS:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Red Dog:

    Dec 1944 3rd and 5th Para Divisions along with the SS 500th Para Battalion and elements of The Brandenburg Regiment made a parachute drop durring the Ardennes Offensive, but failed to cut the Eupen-Malmedy road.

    I think you'll find that the actual drop was substantially less grandiose than two divs + an independant bn + some brandenburgers.

    Did the Germans ever have the capability to lift 2+ divs at once?

    Regards

    JonS </font>

  7. Originally posted by redwolf:

    Remember, the Fallschirmjaeger didn't hunt any parachutes after Krete, and afterwards they were very capable infantry worth reinforcing to get some job done.

    That's a very comon misconception...

    July 12, 1943 1st Para Division parachuted into the Catania sector of Sicily.

    Sept 1943 Parachute operation by 4th Battalion of the Assault Regiment to take out the headquarters of the Italian Army in Monte Rotondo.

    Sept 1943 Para Training Battalion made a glider assault to release Mussolini.

    Sept 1943 2nd Battalion made a parachute drop to capture the island of Elba.

    Nov 1943 Parachute opertaion by 1st Battalion, 2nd Para Regiment to capture the island of Leros.

    May 1944 SS 500th Para Battalion made a combined parachute and glider drop to capture Marshal Tito at Drvar in Yugoslavia.

    Dec 1944 3rd and 5th Para Divisions along with the SS 500th Para Battalion and elements of The Brandenburg Regiment made a parachute drop durring the Ardennes Offensive, but failed to cut the Eupen-Malmedy road.

    Nothing on the grand scale of Krete certainly, but they weren't exactly stuck in the mud for the rest of the war either...

  8. Originally posted by Alech:

    Right now I'm thinking one standard company with a StuG and 2 snipers as support, but I'm curious as to what other units I could attach. I'm assuming they had some sort of MGs as well?

    -Alech

    MG 34 or MG 42. A good rule of thumb would be to think of wether or not it could be dropped by parachute or glider, and how easily could it be moved once on the ground by manpower alone. They were usually equipped with the best that was available that they could carry.
  9. Panzerfaust,

    Panzerschreck,

    Pueppchen,

    81mm Mortar (had a shorter barrel than the standard version),

    105mm Nebelwerfer,

    12cm Granatenwerfer 42,

    Pz B 41 (the gunshield was removed to save weight and it was fitted on a light alloy cradle with ballon tires)

    Pak36/37

    75mm LG 40

    10.5cm LG 40

    A typical Fallschirmjäger division would include an Artillery Regiment, an Anti-Tank Battalion, a Signals Battalion, a Medical Battalion, and an Engineer Battalion.

    There was also an SS Fallschirmjäger Battalion (which started off as a penal unit).

    If you're looking for information on any particular unit I can try to look it up for you.

    [ August 10, 2004, 02:15 AM: Message edited by: Red Dog ]

  10. Originally posted by Moon:

    Yes, if a friendly unit crosses the fire line, there will be no casualties. If the friendly unit enters the target area, the area fire order will additionally be cancelled by the TacAI.

    Martin

    I believe this is also dependant on the experience level of the unit and visibility. I recall a night battle in a village with my conscript partisans were there was so much "friendly fire" that the Germans could have just sat outside the town and not fired a shot and they still would have won...

    Although realistic, it was quite frustrating to watch as my Maxim HMG opened up on one of my own platoons as they tried to sneak across a street. :( :mad: :eek:

  11. Originally posted by TheCrow:

    Too many post talk about undermodelled soviets.

    I think there are two obvious uppermodelled features in Soviet tanks.

    They has a very good visibility buttoned and high accuracy at great ranges, similar, sometimes seems even superior than German tanks. These proSoviet features reduce historical advantage of german tanks versus soviets.

    They become extremly detrimental to germans, at summer 41 tank battles, and long range combat with tank destroyers like Gerald said.

    You obviously have not met my Russian tank crews... in a recent QB against my father over TCP/IP I had a platoon of T-34/85s all in hull down positions which opened fire at 800m on two of his Panthers as they crossed an open field... By the end of the second turn of firing, I had three of my tanks knocked out, one with gun damage, and one retreating after a partial penetration. :eek: I had only scored a single hit on one of his Panthers, which did no damage... :confused: my crews were regular and one vet in case you were wondering...
  12. Originally posted by MikeyD:

    If you want to go really obscure, I suppose the 105mm recoiless rifle is currently the more obscure of two types that were produced. I always could mod the more common version... for that one guy that may get around to buying it in a QB this year! :D;)

    I use these quite often when I take fallschirmjaegers in QBs. I just don't feel right giving them the standard AT guns (or any vehicle support for that matter). So I limit myself to panzerschrecks, Pz B 41 (28mm heavy AT rifle in the game), and of course the recoilless guns.

    So especially in a late war game, I need that 10.5cm LG 40 to take out any tanks. It's great against infantry too... Just wish it wasn't so easy to spot... Luckily I've had pretty good luck with first shot kills with it though. :cool:

  13. Originally posted by Meach:

    I never get the BORESIGHTED message no matter how close enemy are to the TRP, am I doing something wrong? Mostly I use bunkers so do they not benefit from this?

    If I recall correctly, bunkers automatically get the boresighted bonus even without a TRP. Since it is a fixed fortification, and it's probably been there long enough for the gun crew to have marked off the range to various pieces of terrain.
  14. Never fear, the Germans have one as well. The Sdkfz 251/21, which carries three 15mm MG151/15 machine guns and an MG34 (or was it MG42?).

    Although the in game model isn't nearly as cool as the M17's... :(

    I hope they plan on redoing the model for this one. Right now the game just uses the regular sdfkz 251 model.

    sdkfz251-21.jpg

    Now why can't I get the image to display? :confused:

    Go to http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/3620/sdkfz251-21.jpg to see it for yourself.

    [ December 13, 2002, 08:11 PM: Message edited by: Red Dog ]

  15. Originally posted by Determinant:

    A round of buckshot delivers nine(ish) balls each of about .38 calibre. The shot distribution pattern will be similar to birdshot - the physics are the same. Birdshot will deliver a denser spread - more, smaller shot but the pattern is the same. I have heard of people shooting wild fowl bringing down two or three birds with a shot but seven?

    Just wanted to point out that combat shotguns are often equiped with a duck-bill choke, which gives the pellet spread a much more horizontal pattern. Taking this into concideration, hitting multiple man-sized target's becomes much more likely. But 14 is still a bit unbelievable...

    I used to own a Mossberg 500 with a duck-bill choke and a bayonet on it (x-girlfriend's father was a gunsmith and he fixed it up for me as a Xmas gift). Unfortunately, I was realy desperate for money a few years back and had to sell it. :(

    It was the perfect home defense gun...

  16. <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Chad Harrison:

    looks like the world will never know which one represents it better. ill go back to counting the licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie pop so atleast one mystery will be solved.<hr></blockquote>

    527, Although I suppose tongue size and pressure would effect this number some...

    [ 12-02-2001: Message edited by: Red Dog ]</p>

  17. <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Scipio:

    That's the reason why the 3.7AA is such a deadly tankkiller, while it was in reality AFAIK never used as AT weapon. Possibly if nothing else was available, and I assume it wasn't very successfull.<hr></blockquote>

    Actually, wasn't the 3.7cm AA gun also mounted on later models of the Stuka specifically for killing tanks... If it is indeed the same weapon, it was quite effective in this roll. Granted these would be hits through the much thinner top armor, but a penetrating hit is still a penetrating hit and it does show that the little 3.7cm could easily knock out tanks.

×
×
  • Create New...