Jump to content

Phil Squair

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Phil Squair

  1. I would offer these definitions for your high school students.

    Tactics -- The ability to get your hand up your girlfriend's shirt without getting slapped.

    Strategy -- Planning your date to ensure you and your girlfriend are left alone in the dark at some point toward the end of the evening.

    Logistics -- Making sure your older brother visiting from college remembers to buy you and your girlfriend beer.

    :cool:

  2. Major H:

    I stipulate that your military contracts are substantially larger than "private sector" purchases. Now to my question...

    ...I am a relatively lame solitaire player. I love the game because it of its unique interface and credible treatment of the subject matter. I believe -- and I think I speak for the entire TacOps community -- that you have done a great job building the credibility of the game both from a technical standpoint and a gaming standpoint.

    [Aside: don't you love how when someone asks a question and the sum total of Major H's answer is "Correct program response"? End of subject.]

    Anyway, I read with worry Major H's response about how the v4.0 will not allow for solitaire play as OPFOR.

    Is anyone else out there worried that game development has been driven by military contracts rather than playability considerations?

    FYI, I play significant numbers of other games via PBEM and have managed 2 on-line wargame ladders

    Thanks,

    Phil "Lame Gamer" Squair

  3. Any advice for a civilian on how best to use Apaches? Are they better against hard or soft targets? They're pretty vulnerable sitting up there, so moving them around seems to be important. I've been messing around with the Fenwick scenario and am definitely not using them up to their potential. Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...