Hagen is a friend of mine. Within two hours of downloading the demo he had made up his mind (what little there is of it) about the game. He said: There is no game there." He was adamant and certain that he was right.
Over the last ten years we have tried most computer games. Most times we agree about games especially the universally recognized dogs. There is a difference in our taste in games. I don't care for real time games like C&C or Age of Empires. I thought the first Close Combat was terrible. He liked it. Many times we have called each other and said: "You got to go out and get ______." About half time we call each other back and say "How can you seriously like that game?" Ultimately enjoyment of a game comes down to a matter of personal taste.
I have yet to make my mind up about CM. Overall, I have a favorable opinion based on my experience to date. I view it as a vastly better Close Combat. My opinion may change with continued play. Even if I like the game, over time I may become bored. How many scenarios will be significantly different from the others?
There is a fatigue factor in gaming. I absolutely loved Panzer General, Civ I & II and Railroad Tycoon. Alpha C. and RRTII (both well received games)didn't ring any bells for me. The magic of the orignals was not there. I bought Panzer Elite earlier this week and returned it after three hours of play (I loved the orignal M1TP). I just didn't enjoy the game. I loved Reach For The Stars. Will I love the sequel? After so many games, we keep looking for the next one that will knock our socks off. CM didn't knock Hagen's socks off.
Are Hagen's points valid? I agree with some. The fog of war can be debated endlessly without reaching agreement. Ultimately CM is a game. Hagen didn't enjoy it. I didn't enjoy Panzer Elite. A lot of people probably will. Hagen gave his opinion of what he didn't like and why. It is not the game he wants. I have often suggested that Hagen put his opinions to the test by designing his own game.
CM is the designers statement of what he considers to be a good WWII tactical combat game. An objective measure of CM's success will be its reception in the market for which it was intended.
P.S. Hagen is a good guy and a passionate gamer; even if he is totally unreliable about returning calls and playing more than once every six months.
Bill Rom
[This message has been edited by Bill Rom (edited 10-30-99).]
[This message has been edited by Bill Rom (edited 10-30-99).]