Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

Stirring the Pot on Early Tiger Armor Resistance


Recommended Posts

A U.S. firing test report was presented in our book where 90mm HVAP was fired against 8" armor at Brinell Hardnesses from 223 (somewhat soft for armor) to 390 (somewhat hard).

The firing test results suggest that early Tiger 82mm and 62mm side plates, and maybe the 102mm front hull, would gain in resistance against tungsten core ammo.

Firing 90mm HVAP against vertical plate, the U.S. limit velocities were:

2530 feet per second for 223 Brinell

2640 feet per second for 260 Brinell

2660 feet per second for 390 Brinell

2800 feet per second for 339 Brinell

The 339 Brinell armor would be about +9.4% more effective than 260 Brinell in terms of vertical equivalence against 90mm HVAP.

8" armor against 90mm HVAP has about the same ratio of armor thickness/core width as 82mm versus 45mm APCR.

While one firing trial does not a universe make, and random variations in projectile performance could account for the differences, the results do suggest that early Tiger armor might possibly obtain a small boost against Russian APCR hits due to the unusual hardness (315 to 360 Brinell).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...