Recent presentation about Nozh ERA in Combat Mission Black Sea Posted February 1, 2020 24 minutes ago, exsonic01 said: Any source about this data? Title of document? It's not a document,it comes from a short article about Thai Army's Oplot-T and VT-4 on Weibo,all data based on unclassified information The author speculated the turret can provide about 600mm vs KE and 630mm vs CE without ERA based on these two article http://btvt.info/1inservice/t-80ud/t-80ud.htm http://btvt.info/1inservice/t-80u.htm ERA protection capability comes from this article http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/duplet.htm The values are for reference only,but I think Oplot-M is too easy to be penetrated in the game even Russian tank is using new ammo like svinets-1/2 0
Recent presentation about Nozh ERA in Combat Mission Black Sea Posted January 31, 2020 Some information about Oplot-M from Chinese Network,protection capability of Oplot-M compare to VT--4 front turret >1100mm vs KE,>1500mm vs CE front hull >900mm vs KE,>1300mm vs CE 0
Recent presentation about Nozh ERA
in Combat Mission Black Sea
Posted
It's not a document,it comes from a short article about Thai Army's Oplot-T and VT-4 on Weibo,all data based on unclassified information
The author speculated the turret can provide about 600mm vs KE and 630mm vs CE without ERA based on these two article
http://btvt.info/1inservice/t-80ud/t-80ud.htm
http://btvt.info/1inservice/t-80u.htm
ERA protection capability comes from this article
http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/duplet.htm
The values are for reference only,but I think Oplot-M is too easy to be penetrated in the game even Russian tank is using new ammo like svinets-1/2