Jump to content

Niko3

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Niko3

  1. I didn't be sarcastic at less want's my intention, just ask for something to simple like be polite, sorry if that makes you angry.

    What you call "upgrade" fix many things that had to be on CMBN mixed with some minors new things, that is my point so if in every new module they make you have to pay for upgrade all the rest of your games, right now just have CMBN but in the future would be many of them, that is ridicules, so for example, what happen with the flamethrowers that have to be in CMBN? will need to pay if they come in another module?? awesome.

  2. First at all I will appreciate if all the answer are the same polite as I was in my post, I can understand that many people don't think like me, sounds awesome but at less, again be polite.

    Be rude or scream don't makes you be right.

    At the moment I don't know any company that have to pay for patches/upgrades like Battlefront, they didn't before with CMx1 and many games, if you don't want to see this point and want to pay for something that have to be free is up to you.

  3. So, what does this mean in concrete terms for you right now, playing Combat Mission: Battle for Normandy and enviously gawking at the Combat Mission: Fortress Italy feature list? It means that once CMFI is out sometime in August, we'll work on an Upgrade 2.0 for CMBN. You will be able to buy this upgrade (the price is not yet determined), install it and voila, you will have Combat Mission: Battle for Normandy v2.0!!! The upgrade will automatically work for the base game and the Commonwealth module.

    After read this I just can say this is AWESOME, so you will need to pay for something that had to be in the CMx2 engine and now have to pay for every "upgrade/patches" Battlefront make after any module is created; It is clearly abusive, I finished with this CMx2? series, good luck but sincerely with this priority to take money for all now u is a great error, many gamers like me have the same opinion.

    Time to back AGAIN to CMx1

  4. Doing early-war WWII would probably require a whole new game; a module would probably not be sufficient because there is so little commonality in equipment and TO&E.

    Doing a whole new game about the early war is definitely not on BFC's short list, as Steve has said.

    Thanks Field for the answer.

    What about '39? Think about the sales in Poland! What if... If only...

    C3k, really to make that type of answer is better don't said nothing, BTW the people don't buy just wargames were his country take part but anyway all is said.

    Cheers

    Niko

  5. Thanks for the answers!

    Talk about 10 years, I recall all the way back in 2000(?) Steve or Matt mentioning an early war Blitz title as part of their Soviet-style "Five Year Plan" for CMx1. Circumstances prevented that from happening.

    Steve mentions in another post here that an early war title had the least likelihood of sales success from among potential titles. You've got to admit the title would be... awkward. The game would end when the French government in Vichy capitulates to the Nazis. Eeew, not exactly a satisfying resolution to shoot for.

    I am not said have to start on that year, BTW, don't need to be a problem you have lot of wargames out there that start on that year(French Campaign-Belgium-Low Countries, Norway, Early China Campaign and Finland) and works very nice, the Germans and many countries use French vehicles/weapons on many fronts (from Balkans, East Front, Pacific to Africa).

    I just want to know if that years are planed to make for future "modules" like they are doing with CMSF.

    Thanks in advance!

    Cheers

    Niko

×
×
  • Create New...