[IDF vs NATO]

The short answer is...I despise them, tactics and attitude.

Wow, bro... How about a long answer? IMO, Tzahal is very efficient force. What's wrong?

The IDF would be interesting, from the point of view of MBT-class APCs etc. but it is such a current political hot potato that BFC don't want to go there.

Ah, that's the reason. Silly.

[IDF vs NATO]

For me they are the last military force i would like to see in a game.

Why is that? Canadian goody-goodies are more fun?

[IDF vs NATO]

different northern Syria geography

Mountains?..

Israel has a habit of bombing UN peacekeepers. 'Accidentally' of course, always accidentally.

Yep, in cases like enemy mortars firing from UN hospital roof, etc. Wouldn't you call in CAS in such situation?

BF aren't gonna do it, so no use in asking.

Disappointing, but thanks for straight answer.

That made me raise my eyebrow, man.

I meant all the Arab-Israeli wars.

[IDF vs NATO]

About half-announced NATO module: don't you think it will be kinda boring? I mean, it won't implement any new tactics, just some units without any major differences. And it would be very hard to make a new sensible campaign, I think. Wouldn't it be much more interesting to switch attention to Israel Defense Forces? Syria and uncons look like perfect opponents, IDF has much more combat experience than any NATO army, they differ in tactics and equipment... so, why NATO and not IDF?

[Open hatches and HEAT]

I heard, that in Afghanistan and Chechnya some tank/BMP crews preferred to drive (especially in convoy) with open hatches, 'cause it greatly improves crew chances of survival if the vehicle is hit with HEAT. 1) Is there any similar practice among the Western Tankers and 2) is this simulated in CMSF?

PS I didn't speak or write in English for some years -- so don't laugh too loud.