Jump to content

lrrprecon

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by lrrprecon

  1. When i became the armorer for my troop. Before we deployed to Iraq. We sent 6 of our SCOUTS to Sniper school for a 2 week crash course. When they came back from the school.

    I issued each individual, the M24 Sniper Weapon system.

    M24_components.jpg

    And each sniper team (3) was issued:

    The M82 Barret Sniper Rifle weapon system.

    800px-Barrett-M82-latrun-exhibition-1.jpg

    The sniper teams were also issued M4's. But in-game i noticed they used M16's. And in INF squads "Sharpshooters" use the M16 with scope. I know in Iraq i had a ACOG on my M4 with M203. The M4 is a versatile weapon with many interchangable mounts. But Caliber lacks any knockdown power at all. I saw a Iraqi take 6 shots to his back and he kept on running. Really sad the US hasn't come up with a better standard issue weapon, with some kind of knockdown power. We still are going off of a OLD mind set back from the Vietnam days. Considering this is a new age and all.

    SOPMOD_2-2005.jpg

    [ September 20, 2007, 11:26 AM: Message edited by: lrrprecon ]

  2. Originally posted by birdstrike:

    Does anyone know how detailed the game models hull-down in relation to the 3d model?

    i.e. whether the game takes into consideration if only the sensor system is exposed above a crest?

    Bird i have seen no tactical advantage with being hull down in game. It really depends on your Gunners accuracy and Bonuses. I'm not sure of the specifics in calculation and what not. I remember on the first map of the Campaign, i was behind the Berm and shooting through the Berm resulting in kills on the hull-down T-54/55 MBT's. But i really haven't used much of hull down at all, i use buildings as a barrier and creep my Strykers out a bit just to get shots on INF in the open. Thats the closest i ever get to being hull down. Granted its not really being "Hull Down" a M1A2 SEP hull down would be devistating though!
  3. Originally posted by Rollstoy:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Battlefront.com:

    ... The LTC said that afterwards they went up to the roof and found bits of the sniper and that was all ...

    Morbid conclusion: neither roof nor building collapsed. A toned-down Javelin would significantly impact gameplay!

    Best regards,

    Thomm </font>

  4. Jesus christ, just throw the patch on 2 pieces of bread with cheese, some mustard, pickles and lettuce. And a whole lot of loving! and throw in the occasional Guinness and bring on the patch already.

    The retard who keeps saying the patch should be out, your killing me. I see you as a evil "Paul Revere" running around the forums saying, "THE PATCH IS COMMING, THE PATCH IS COMMING.".....

  5. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    Camp Liberty at BIAP has a Popeye's. POPEYE's !!!! Seriously. Fried Chicken, sweet tea, in a "warzone". It's ridiculous.

    And a Cinnabon! and Burger King. Granted the lettuce was nasty wet, but they sure weren't bad on a long patrol. We would go to BIAP and buy like 30 Whoppers at a time! It was crazy!
  6. Originally posted by Splinty:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by lrrprecon:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Splinty:

    Irrepcon, I spent 10 years in Mech Infantry, 3 in 113s and 7 in Brads. I am in Baghdad right now as an MP(15 days left!) and I work with Strykers quite often. The Stryker guys I've talked to think very highly of it and like me think the 113 is a piece of crap. This my 3rd tour in Iraq and my 18th year in the Army, so at least in my case I know that of which I speak.

    Well thats great, thanks for your opinion. You guys stop patrols considering your countdown? We did patrols and right seat rides up to our 5th day before we packed up to head home. Well i stayed to load up the HET's and then a month in kuwait at Camp Arifjan to load the VEH's on the boat. What unit you with? </font>
  7. Originally posted by JasonC:

    Well, according to this, the unit replacement cost for the TOW is $180,000.

    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/tow.htm

    But that may be for the launcher and guidance unit. The missiles may be as cheap as $19,000 if you average historical cost.

    Since the US armed forces bought something like 200,000 and haven't remotely expended that number (gulf war I they fired 3000, and the active phase of Iraq II they fired 560 - of course some are used in training etc), you don't actually buy a new one every time you fire one off.

    It does cost to advance the system capability, though. Raytheon is getting $163 million for the new wireless TOW to be fielded by 2012.

    Is a wireless TOW a round square? lol - well I suppose wireless, like wire-guided, starts with w. But maybe they should be TOR - tube launched, optically tracked, radio guided.

    Hell if i know man, i never saw a actual javeline missle in Iraq, just the CLU. Now when i went to the Javelin class i saw everything that deals with the Javeline missle system. **** i just remembered we actually did use 1 CLU in my armory. We had it out at CP22A on MSR Tampa. We used it for CP (Check Point) security at night. It has white hot vision, and you can see farther out, it has a very nice view distance. Amazing how i can't remember little details until people talk about this stuff. I think i have alzheimers....
  8. Originally posted by Splinty:

    Irrepcon, I spent 10 years in Mech Infantry, 3 in 113s and 7 in Brads. I am in Baghdad right now as an MP(15 days left!) and I work with Strykers quite often. The Stryker guys I've talked to think very highly of it and like me think the 113 is a piece of crap. This my 3rd tour in Iraq and my 18th year in the Army, so at least in my case I know that of which I speak.

    Well thats great, thanks for your opinion. You guys stop patrols considering your countdown? We did patrols and right seat rides up to our 5th day before we packed up to head home. Well i stayed to load up the HET's and then a month in kuwait at Camp Arifjan to load the VEH's on the boat. What unit you with?
  9. Well i guess if the VEH has no Weapon platform and uses a LRAS, its main job is for RECON for a larger force. But in all reality from what i have seen from my tour in Iraq, my troop utilized our Scouts, but in Iraq we are not utilizing RECON Doctrine. We go from house to house on searches and raids, bounce faces off the blacklist for our AO, ask questions and track down who is hiding weapons and explosives, find the cache's, dig em up and blow them up. Or we drive around till we get blown up, while on our patrols. I kinda felt like a cop on his beat, just going around and keeping the peace and what not.

  10. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    JasonC,

    Interesting website. I thought they were much less, per missle round, but the CLU sounded right.

    Hehe this made me laugh and i remember before i went to the MIT team, i was the armorer for my troop. We had 6 CLU's in my armorer's room. And i never had any Javelin missles. They sat in my armory room the whole time i was in Iraq and never moved from the spot i had them in.
  11. Personally i would like to know how many of you who actually post here ever been in a M113 or Stryker. I know i have been in a M113 and i have driven one also. When it comes to a Stryker, i have been in the ones that went boom and now reside at the Stryker bone yard at Kuwait docks. Some of you armchair warriors only know what you read or see on CNN. If you really want a experience go down to your local recruiter, raise your right hand and give away some of your freedom for a couple years. Then your perspective of how these vehicles operate will be more clear. Personnaly i would pick a M113 over the Stryker, reason being i know how it works and operates. If you know how to drive a M1 then you should have no prob driving a M113. And another thing, a Stryker can not PIVOT steer, and in combat, i would rather want to PIVOT steer then back up. M113 is a versatile track vehicle, the army uses it for practically everything. So you could say its a very used workhorse. I also saw a Stryker break from its chains on a HET at CP22A on MSR Tampa, in Iraq and IMMEDIATLY catch fire and burn, i brought home a solidified disc from the armor that melted off the stryker. You can have that piece of c-r-a-p, i'll stick with my M113.

    [ August 29, 2007, 06:36 AM: Message edited by: lrrprecon ]

  12. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    I thought you would have done that MOUT site prior to deployment, the whole regiment did. I even played OpFor for a week out there. I'd love to see the new one with all the high tech stuff.

    Yeah, i was watching Discovery channel and they were showing the new MOUT site with all the pyrotechnics. It was pretty sweet, kinda wanted to go through that scenario. But my days of doing that are over, i'm going through my 2nd knee surgery and i am getting a P3 profile and MEB. So i am getting out of the Army, and personnally thats fine with me. I am currently one of the poor bastards that got sent to 3ID, after our Regiment moved to Fort Hood, Texas.
  13. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    The Special Forces compound on Fort Carson has had a MOUT site for years. One of our platoons actually came back from the MOUT site after playing with SF there, covered in welts. Simunition hurts, apparently.

    Sorry let me rephrase that. They are building a new URBAN MOUNT site with pyrotechnics and all the nice speacial effects and what not. I know what MOUNT site you are talking about bro, cause we had training there before i deployed to Iraq.
  14. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    Riding in the back of a Bradley in the desert, especially open desert with the heat, sucks. It's loud, it's unbeleivably hotter, no air circulates, it's dark, it's full of dust, anything not bolted or strapped down becomes a projectile, it vibrates loudly during the best ride, it shakes fillings loose and causes concussions in the worst rides, and the ramp always seems to drop right as you are getting a good nap.

    The Stryker looks like a luxury car in the pictures of its interior.

    Given all that. I'm still a fan of the Bradley. For absolutely no good reason.

    OMG dont get me started about Bradleys...talk about like being in a grinder! And yes when i got done riding around in the back when i got out i basically took two steps and i fell down liek a drunken old man. I got to drive one too, talk about waiting when you hit the gas.....3-6 sec delay on movement...but anyway yeah Bradleys are a real treat to ride in...
  15. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    I read in another thread about you being in Thunder Squadron. Did you get to come up to Tal Afar for the big party we threw the insurgents ?

    No man i was with Thunder Squadron, South of Baghdad at FOB Falcon, right on ASR Jackson N of MSR Tampa.
  16. Originally posted by MEFBRAVO:

    Just wanted to see what thoughts were on this tactic and how it relates to CM:SF.

    First, I have no military experience just what I have read, so please correct on anything I have said incorrectly.

    One of the Tactics the US uses is based on the 3 F's:

    1. Find the enemy- recon

    2. Fix the enemy in position- supressing

    3. Finish the enemy with overwhelming firepower- arty, CAS, more weapons

    This appears to have strong merit in the game and I used successfully in mission 1 of campaign. However, with limited resources and it being a game, I am having a harder time applying when it comes to UO.

    I am playing airbase which from what I have read is a tough map to begin with. I am wondering how you all use your units to apply tactics of any sort, as well as when and how you have found best to use your infantry.

    I have read many posts on how they don't like to use infantry. I am more interested in how you have been successful using them. I am not so concerned about scoring points etc, as much as playing the game as realistic as I can but also keeping it fun.

    I cannot figure out when to deploy my infantry without them getting chewed up even when i have been supressing the enemy. Not deploying into a building but for street to street moving or bldg. to bldg. moving I seem to take significant losses. Almost, like I am missing a key ingredient to supressing the enemy.

    Overall, I believe the 3Fs make a lot of sense with the game, I just don't know exactly when and how to apply them. Anyone have any advice would be appreciated.

    Cheers!

    MEFBRAVO, in real combat, Urban warfare is unforgiving. Nowday's claymore mines are placed above door frames and are triggered once the door is breached. I lost a good friend of mine up in Talafar to a claymore above the door trick the haji's like to use. I think they made the game right on target when it comes to building to building fighting or CQB (Close Quarters Battle). A way to do it in game is use your MBT's, Bradleys or Strykers to suppress the enemy squad dug in and assault using your INF. But like i said Urban warfare is unforgiving, your always going to have allot of casualties. Right now they are building a MOUNT site in Fort Carson to train soldiers more effectivly on Urban warfare which most soldiers these days are only trained on open warfare. I know there is a MOUNT site built in Kentucky at the Armor Training School i went to, but it was completed after i graduated there and deployed to Iraq and got a real taste of Urban combat. So i guess in the future we will see how the US Urban warfare doctrine fares in time.
  17. True considering in my MOS 19K (M1 Tank Crew Member), in PC terms would be: "Heavy Machinery Technician or Operator" or something in that general aspect....crazy how Civ's come up with those terms. Granted i guess you wouldn't want to be called a "Janitor" if you did that in real life, now they got new PC job titles for every profession....Its funny actually...anyways i will shut up now.

  18. Originally posted by Bradley Dick:

    If I was a Blackwater employee who was in between deployments, which I wouldn't say if I was or not, I would resent the "Mercenary" label.

    It's Private Security Contractor.

    Well i wasn't trying to be PC about the comment, cause thats what Combat MOS personnel call 'em Mercs, Mercenary, Hired Killers...etc. Why hide behind a PC "Private Security Contractor" anyways.. in my opinion. I met some Blackwater employee's in BIOP, i think it was FOB Victory or FOB Stryker, good bunch of guys though.
  19. I'm going to throw in my opinion here, considerin gi have been to the Stryker Bone yard in Kuwait, when i was redeploying back to the states, but had to stay a extra month to help load Tanks and Bradley's, on the ship to send them back to the states. Strykers are a OK wheeled VEH with the RPG rails on, they are quiet and perfect for night OP's. But personnally i dont like them, the GUN system is nice, just like the M1114 Uparmored HWMMV's (Some) have over there now. Less casualties from gunners being shot by snipers. The US government just spent 3.2 or 2.3 billion dollars on the MWRP the vehicles that Blackwater (Mercenaries organization) uses there now. They are trying to replace the M1114 with the new MWRP, as it can stand a AT mine hit directly. I have seen this with my own eyes and it is very amazing!

    Anyways rant off, i just wanted to give my opinion .

×
×
  • Create New...