Jump to content

Slamelov

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Slamelov

  1. - Waypoints, I would like to order my soldiers to go by that path

    - More tactical options, smoke in tanks, tank commander opening the hatch, hide... use a right button menu, or something like that.

    - Allow enter buildings.

    - Multiplayer. Do you know Myth series multiplayer?. You can play the campaign cooperatively and assign units to every player in the same team. Now, the multiplayer sucks because it has notpause and two players can't be in the same team. Think about it...

    - LOS is good for me, but I would like infantry could cover in the grass or mood.

  2. Hi

    Now that the game is just released, it's moment to post some ideas to improve the game in the next patchs.

    - Pathways, I would like to order my soldiers to go by that path

    - More tactical options, smoke in tanks, tank commander opening the hatch, hide... use a right button menu, or something like that.

    - Allow enter buildings.

    - Multiplayer. Do you know Myth series multiplayer?. You can play the campaign cooperatively and assign units to every player in the same team. Now, the multiplayer sucks because it has notpause and two players can't be in the same team. Think about it...

  3. Originally posted by Jester_159th:

    One thing you've got to remember about flight sims: Even the best looking flight sims have terrain that is VASTLY simplified compared to the terrain in any ground based sim.

    The more accurate you make the terrain, the less polys you can put into the models themselves. When you consider the number of polys used to make models such as the MiG-29 or Su-25 varants in LO-MAC, to use the same number of polys in a tank would mean your terrain would have to hardly more than a green surface over a basic mesh. From the air LO-MAC (IMHO) is the best looking flight sim out at present. But, if you have a copy of it, get down low and ask yourself if you would be prepared to accept that terrain in a ground based sim. I wouldn't.

    The bottom line is it's a trade off that's necessary due to the limitations of PC hardware.

    May be, but the scenery is much bigger that any ground sim, if Lomac had the T72BiF scenery, they could use more polygons to the terrain detail.
  4. Kobra, Secure Rom is not so "heavy" than Starforce, but anyway, yes, it should be adviced. Remember that SF removes units from your system.

    Incorrect, this isn't even close to how Starforce works. It doesn't deactivate any software product. This is a pure myth, perpetuated by a few paranoid folk.

    I have seen it by myself, its not a myth. Not only units, memory card readers also.

    NO product is 100% compatible with every mickey-mouse setup out there. Starforce is no different. The sheer amount of "BS" attributed to Starforce is mind blowing. Most of the time we find out it was the persons improperly configured BIOS or something else entirely.

    No, you are not right. Could you tell it to UBI, they jave sent me many keys to allow running my DVD. And I only have problems with SHIII and FC, not any other game in the market (y buy about 12 or more games at year, 10 more are send me for testing purposes...)

    WTF stress? Yea, those 5 minutes a month really add up on a reader that is rated for 55,000 hours.

    Strees, the excesive workload to the reader everytime game is started.

    Really? They've been trying to crack Starforce3 for nearly 8 months and have failed.

    Yes, sure :D

    That's why GTR, Obscure, SHIII and many other games are cracked and many people playing it. It's so paradoxical than you can use a simple crack to play SHIII and forget all the SF problems. Of course I will not tell you where, but surely you know where.

    The facts: SF installs hidden and prenicious software without advising it. I don't care if creative does it also, the fact is that SF does it. It's an abuse and I have the right to know if a game comes with SF or not before buying it. Ill never buy a game with SF.

    I remember that X2 the Threat removed SF protection with a patch after User complainings about it.

  5. Originally posted by JudoHedgehog:

    What "principle"? The right of a company that spends thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars development on their intellectual property can't defend that IP as they see fit?

    If you don't like it, don't buy it is fine but the Starforce "revolutionaries" crack me up.

    The right of the legal user to not install hidden programs into their system, that's all. Games should advice CLEARLY that uses Starforce and it's not unistalled using the traditional uninstall method.

    You should know that SF deactivates recorders for some recording software, the same for 6on1 memory card readers. It's an intrusive copy protection system and pernicious in many cases.

    By example, I bought SHIII, but DVD is not recognized 50% times. FC turned my system unstable after installing it, but when I removed it (and using SF removal tool), system was stable again.

    And what about the stress to the readers?

    So, I think SF is an abuse for the legal user. (The pirate does not care the SF, he knows sooner or later the game will be cracked).

    So, Ill never buy a game with SF and I always ask for this question when I'm interested in a game.

    Regards

  6. I only wanted to know if BuF uses Starforce, and it's nice to hear that it doesn't.

    Starforce is an intrusive program and I had some problems with Flamming Cliffs and Silent Hunter III, both games uninstalled and 60€ missed, so, I'll never buy a game with such of protection.

×
×
  • Create New...