Tifosi
-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Posts posted by Tifosi
-
-
Most of what I could come up with has already been mentioned, apart from letting the player have more control over when CAS (if any is available) shows up. Let us call down death from above when WE need it, not when the AI decides to grace us with it!!
-
To my eternal shame, I went down the "quit" path some time ago. I had a couple of games on the go when I had to move house in the middle of it all. I was offline for a couple of months and when I finally got up and running again I simply neglected to resume a couple of battles which I pretty much knew were hopeless.
With hindsight it was the wrong decision - so a big SORRY to the two guys I left hanging - and for any new PBEM players out there I would only say DON'T JUST QUIT!! Instead of getting some valuable experience from those games I just buried 'em and have actually felt rather bad about it ever since.
Still, I have now re-entered the PBEM fray and hope to learn from getting my arse kicked up and down the battlefield a few times how this game SHOULD be played.
Cheers,
Scott
-
Oh - I got the answer. This is a trick question huh? The poles could not defeat the Blitz, because the Blitz was directed against London and other British cities. The Blitzkrieg on the other hand.....Originally posted by General Colt:So back to the topic: What if Poland had defeated the Blitz? :confused: Huh? :confused: You arm chair generals got any answers to this one?
BRB-I gotta go get another beer.
-
I have to admit most of what I know on this topic is from reading memoirs, articles etc written by, or from the perspective of, pilots. I suppose it's a fair assumption that many would believe they had scored a hit when they hadn't - ANY claims made by any airforce during combat were invariably inflated. Not neccesarrily because pilots were falsely claiming (although it did happen) but largely because, as Jason points out it's simply so damn difficult to tell who hit what from the cockpit of fast moving aircraft.
On the issue of aircraft as tank-killers, I humbly stand corrected.
-
I have read accounts of this happening. Rare perhaps, but I'm certain it happened.Originally posted by Michael Emrys:And the whole notion of riccochets off the ground achieving penetrations of the underbelly is complete hogwash.
Michael
Not a huge issue really though, as by 1944 ground attack flights would have carried rockets too. Regardless of what effect the .50cal and 20mm had, it's fair to say you were pretty stuffed as soon as the Jugs and Typhoons turned up with their fireworks aboard.
-
They grow palmtrees up in northern areas of Scotland too - I've seen them, although I will be damned if I can remember exactly where.Originally posted by Philippe:There seems to be an adult palm tree in the first and fourth pictures.
I'm assuming this is a by-product of eccentric gardening. I seem to recall that this also happens in a few spots in Southern England (Penzance? Scilly Isles?).
On the other hand, the European climate is a bit milder now than it was sixty years ago.
It's all to do with the Gulf Stream or something?
-
20mm and .50cal were more than adequate for knocking out tanks (even Tigers) from the air. The RAF developed the tactic in the middle east, but basically you spot the tank, manouver yourself into a position whereby you will be attacking the tank from directly behind or ahead (behind was usually favoured) and straffe it.Originally posted by Mike:Crews tend to get out of immobilsed tanks rather quickly if here's enemy infantry or aircraft about - I've read accounts of Tiger crews who felt utterly vulnerable to air attack and abandoned their tanks even with the aircraft had nothing more than 20mm cannon - they just felt so vulnerable and halpless.
The trick was, as you dived at the tank to aim for the ground a short way behind the tank an "walk" the stream of fire forward over the tank. It was "indirect" hits that did the killing - rounds which ricoched off the ground and went through the floor of the tank. Even if you didn't hit something combustible you stood a good chance of hitting something important and at least knocking it out.
-
Goering. Battle of Britain.Originally posted by Derfel:Interesting issue actually, what constitutes a bad commanding general?
My attempt at definition:
"One who snatches defeat from the jaws of victory"
i.e a leader that has:
adequate forces (quantity and quality)
a defined task
good logistics
a functioning staff
good communications
and STILL manages to lose a battle or fail a given task.
Anybody comes to mind?
-Derfel
Adequate forces - easily. All the way from the Bay of Biscay, right the way along the French, Dutch, German and Norweigan coast were Bomber and Fighter forces, who had the RAF outnumbered at least 5:1 IIRC
A defined task - Render the RAF unable to fight.
Good logistics - In 1940 there was no serious bombing campaign underway against German industry, the Germans occupied the whole of Western Europe more or less and therefore had nothing to seriously interrupt supply lines.
Functioning Staff - Not only functioning, but many of them were seasoned and experienced officers having fought in a number of actions from WWI to the Spanish Civil War and the Blitzkrieg in the east in 1939.
Good communications - OK, possibly not. The luftwaffe was split into Luftflotten (Air Fleets) with each Luftflotten responsible for a different area of the occupied territories. I will need to go do a bit research to remind myself of which fleet covered which area, but there were 2 in France & the Low Countries, one for Germany, one in Scandanavia and another for the East by late 1940.
The Luftflotte generally operated indepently of one another, however they were in theory being co-ordinated by the Luftwaffe high command back in Berlin.
On paper, it should have been a two-week job.
-
Nah. You would only qualify as a nerd if you followed that up with "but the stormtrooper who banged his head on the doorframe in Episode IV, when the droids are hiding on the Death Star is funnier...really, go look"Originally posted by juan_gigante:(god, I'm a nerd)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm just going to stop now and maybe preserve some shred of dignity.
Oh...hang on. I'll get my coat......
-
My tuppence worth,
I got all three CM games in a single pack ("CM:Anthologies") and CMBO was the last one I actually looked at. I wish I had looked at it earlier as it is a great starting place, especially if (like me) you are new to the genre.
Sure, BB and AK are superior "simulations" but BO is a great place to cut your teeth so to speak. The far more simplistic command options, and the fact that units tend to do exactly what you tell them to, make it a better game in many ways to learn the basics of this type of fighting.
Then when you do progress to BB/AK with the far more in depth command lists and less "suicidal" infantry etc, you have a better grasp of the actual tactics and so forth.
A better understanding of what I actually needed my forces to do/not do made learning the intricacies of the enhanced commands etc less of a nightmare than it was when I jumped straight in.
Having said that, a lot of stuff that works in CMBO in terms of some of the more "gamey" approaches you can take, seem not to transfer well to BB/AK. But you see what I'm getting at, right?
-
Omaha, Utah, Gold, Juno, Sword. And I have a feeling I'm forgetting one. Plus the airborne drops on the night of June 5th/6thOriginally posted by Panther Commander:There were far more than one beach involved in the D-Day landings.
-
D'oh - the good ol' simultaneous post fairy is out and about again I see!
-
Hi Hornpiper
I'm a CM rookie myself, and to be honest most of what you need to get started is right on this site. You can use the search tool up on the right there to find threads related to specific topics, and to be honest if it hasn't been covered on here, it probably isn't in the game.
On the whole though, most of the site regulars are a pretty helpful and friendly bunch - just don't wander into the Peng challenge thread by yourself
Try browsing through the Tips and Tricks section too - a lot of good stuff there.
And one last thing - cancel any engagements you may have made for the next few months because these games are more addictive than any other man made or natural substance out there!
-
Typo. I just spotted the comma where there should be a period. Oh, the shame
[edit]: all fixed!
-
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arena/8461/mod.html
for all your mod needs
[ February 01, 2005, 12:41 PM: Message edited by: Tifosi ]
-
No but the death squads et al who operated behind the lines were, IIRC waffen SS.
I do, however, await instant and furious correction from those with a greater depth of knowledge than me on the sublect
-
Never claimed they were. My point was it was the Nazis and the Waffen SS, not the regular German army who wiped out 7 million and commited most of the really nasty acts.
And yes, I am aware of wehrmacht units shooting prisoners and various other horrid activities, many commited on the Eastern Front, but I also pointed out all sides had troops guilty of breaking the rules, such as there can be any in war.
On the other hand, the Japanese regular army were routinely involved in wholesale massacres.
Oh, and for what it's worth, the Swiss army would be my choice.
Imagine the fear I could strike into Fritz's heart with my 93-bladed multi-purpose pocket knife. With a toothpick and everyfink!
-
Umm, Erik, the Japanese army embarked on pretty much wholesale slaughter of prisoners and civilians. It was sort of the expected conduct of a Japanese soldier. As they believed surrender to be cowardly and dishonourable, they felt anyone else who surrendered did not deserve to live. Possibly oversimplifying it there, but you get the idea.
The German Army on the other hand, did not. Yes, the SS operated extermination squads on the eastern front, and also staffed the concentration camps, but the Waffen SS was NOT part of the Wehrmacht, and was more politically driven than the Wehrmacht, all SS members being required to be card-carrying Nazis.
Most (I know - not ALL) attrocities commited by the Germans during WWII can be traced back to the SS.
On the whole, the regular Wehrmacht units conducted themeselves no differently than the armies of other belligerent nations - all of whom, without exeption, did have to deal with acts of extreme nastiness commited by there own.
Just not on the same scale as the Japanese.
-
Oh - and B-17:The Mighty Eighth, and Silent Hunter II. Classics!Originally posted by Tifosi:Hehe - I still got Combat Flight Sim WWII Europe. Love it!
-
Hehe - I still got Combat Flight Sim WWII Europe. Love it!
-
And if you have any questions to ask, just go to CMAK forum and find the thread that has "Peng Challenge" in its title. That is especially meant for newbies! </font>Originally posted by Sergei:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by spartan1:
Welcome to the CM world the most advanced game of its type. We salute you in our community.
A little piece of advice. Search the forums for any detailed info you want on tactics and strategy.
-
It shows up on any selected unit during the replay that is being fired upon.
-
I had never heard of this site before getting CM:Anthologies - all future BFC products will, of course, be ordered from here!Originally posted by dieseltaylor:If you have a look at the CDV site you will eventually discover the horrendous size of the patches. I think one CMBB one was 70MB - it was a fraction of the size if you had the good fortune to have the BFC copy.
I have copies in both publishers formats. Do not waste time on the CDV - the copy protection is a pain as it is very finickety on some CD players.
Most importantly if you by the BFC version, which is shipped from EIRE for Europe, the profit goes directly to the good guys.
-
go to www.combatmission.com or the scenario depot or cmmods.com to see all the stuff you can download, for free, to improve the looks of all 3 games, and also download loads of scenarios and operations.
Who will be playing in years to come
in Combat Mission: Afrika Korps
Posted
I just reinstalled BO, BB and AK after a gap of a couple of years, and am enjoying them now as much as I ever did - more so, in fact, because I took the time this time around to start on the various help threads round these parts and am slowly beggining to learn how to use various unit types to take advantage of their strengths. As opposed to my old technique of throwing everything at the enemy and watching my forces get decimated every time.