[Prefer: abstract tactics or immersion experience?]

i'm one of those who can't be bothered-the attraction to me is a time pressure thing, commander's of the past didn't have time to go from unit to unit viewing how the battle was going, it was more of reports and a good view of the battlefield that the commander based his orders on,okay you must win most if not all your games but i like the human error element it makes for more intresting battles. have you ever play TCP/IP and how lond did it take you

[Whiners...grrr...]

or post their name and a copy of the whin on every forum around and let them take all the flak for being a little girls

[European release question]

anyone have a clue where CDV have got this little gem of (dis?)information

Release: Deutschland, Frankreich, UK: 28 November 2003 / USA: tba

[Give us some ideas]

what about some battle around tobruk mainly during early dec '41 or the battle of Gazala during middle dec'41 when the DAK was holding it's own against superior advancing 8th army forces

[leadership scenario's]

thanks I will, I never looked at leadership as just another way of increasing troops experience levels, i.e. green with +1 = regulars , told you i was daft

[leadership scenario's]

probably me just being daft but as i'm hopeless at creating scenario's are there any that show what a difference leadership can make to squad's i.e. green troops with a outstanding commander beating the living daylight out off veteran troops with a poor leader

[When is the contact command most useful?]

i find it useful when moving through woods and such if enemy contact is expected- never once set ca i'll try that thank FK