Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

graphics: CMBN vs TOW


Recommended Posts

I played TOW series waiting for CMBN. One thjing I liked of TOW, expecially TOW2, was graphics.. I find CMBN ok but not at that level. (I'm not talking about accuracy of details in equipment or veichle, I'm talking about general feeling and smoothness of graphic engine, grass, how buildings blend in the environment..)

Am I completely off?

After 10 years of waiting my expectations were higher than the reality..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree from a gfx perspective.

I think ToW does look better & I had higher expectations from viewing the CMBN screen shots. I played the 2 one after the other & the gfx just draw me right back into ToW. That said CMBN blows PC Ostfront away ;)

I am playing with everything on Max in both games BTW. The upside is I have yet to see any lag or slow-downs in CMBN.

Eye candy is important to me personally but as long as the game-play is good I can wait/live with it.

However I am hoping that sometime there will be a DX11 texture pack or something. [CoH did a patch from DX9 -> DX10 so it's not impossible... :P]

Has the modding community pushed the CMBN texture envelope yet I wonder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eciesse--I agree with you about the overall visual quality of TOW Kursk/Caen--but as a convincing combat simulation with credible and challenging fighting with and against AI units and for the huge variety of OOBs you can select and organize and for all the relistic command and control features which permeate the game --all of which leads to continued and varied challenges and game longevity---CMBN wins hands down.

I played and enjoyed at a certain level TOW games for a while and marvelled particularly at the visual quality--but attractive as they are, I dont think I am likely to return to them when the CMBN game for me provides a much more realistic,convincing and challenging WW2 military environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are certain things that are graphically better in Theatre of War, such as trenches, smoke, explosions, and grass, but other than that I prefer CMBN. There's something about the visuals in Theatre of War that puts me off. A lot of the topography seems unnatural and artificial, there aren't many distinct features or landmarks in the maps, the units and buildings seem very small in comparison to the terrain, and performance is somewhat poor on a decent machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models in TOW, especially the infantry, was pants. The three things i DID prefer was the terrain that appeared to go on into the distance (rather than the flat board of CM), the damage showing on the vehicles and the dead bodies remaining in manned positions, and air support appearing on map.

But Combat Mission is for me far more immersive in every way despite these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all of you. I do not plan on returning to TOW, and performance is better in CMBN, and TOEs are better in CMBN, and c2 is fantastic in CMBN.... But at least I' m not the only one that see a difference.. TOW2 graphics IS superior.. Said that I hope that subsequent mods and patches will help..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, by far TOW has the better graphics, as well the overall presentation has much more immersion for me. I love CMBN but it can definitely feel sterile at times and could use a major "flavor" graphics/UI upgrade that would in my opinion raise the game up to the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for me TOW was much more sterile than CMBN by far. The terrain was always flat and invariably had well prepared defensive positions. It was like siege warfare on a plain.

The detail on the soldier models was certainly not better than CMBN.... the support for more advanced effects however was. Each mission in TOW was pretty much rail roaded and therefore sterile to me.

I have pretty much finished all of the TOW2 campaigns BTW. I did enjoy them, especially the desert one.

Also where are the community campaigns and missions.... the longevity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think CMBN is the better game overall for sure but I do wish BF had some more time to create a more immersive and user-friendly UI. Some more modern graphic and sound techniques would be very welcome as well. I know all the "reasons" the game doesn't have these things, but I am hopefully it could moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One display feature I would like in CNBN which TOW does implement is the apparent continuation of the terrain from the battle area to the screen edge. It avoids this effect of battling on a terrain board with edges floating above the surrounding landscape and nor being part of it.

I dont know how difficult it is to implement such a " terrain continuation" feature but I think it would really improve the overall viewing and feeling of immersiveness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...