bowenw Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Ok generals and admirals could use some advise,:confused: Germany is no problem for me when doing research but Japan is another matter, what would be the order of importance in the research field? First three or four, eg Naval, weapons for infantry, amphibius transport, infrastructure? etc. Any help here or preferences. Bo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaMonkey Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I always like LR for any side I'm playing......kind of melts away the fog. We'll have to take a look at the new CTV tables to really nail down Japan's focus, but I agree that NW will be a high priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerGmbH Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 One thing IMO found is that Japan can live quite good without focalizing on Tank Tech. Like Historically this is probably not a priority for JAP, as also the terrain in Asia is different from the Wide plains in Russia. But this is one point of view, maybe somebody get better results with Focus on JAP Tank tech... You will have plenty of possibilities trying this out after release Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowenw Posted January 24, 2010 Author Share Posted January 24, 2010 One thing IMO found is that Japan can live quite good without focalizing on Tank Tech. Like Historically this is probably not a priority for JAP, as also the terrain in Asia is different from the Wide plains in Russia. But this is one point of view, maybe somebody get better results with Focus on JAP Tank tech... You will have plenty of possibilities trying this out after release PowerGmbH you are absolutley correct in that assement, to me Japanese tanks are usless in this game, would not waste one yen on them, good assessment, give me so more please. Bo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerGmbH Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 PowerGmbH you are absolutley correct in that assement, to me Japanese tanks are usless in this game, would not waste one yen on them, good assessment, give me so more please. Bo Well given the Terrain and supply situation, IMHO Japan needs more HQ than Germany. I think Germany is ok with 3 HQ in Russia 1 in Africa, and some Minors in France, while Japan maybee needs possibly more of them. I think i had one time 3 in China, 1 in Burma, 1 in DEI, 1 in Singpore and felt that i still lack of "more" ... It's quite simple: Japan probably has simulteanous presence in various Islands and Sites, mostly with quite ugly Supply, so if you want as Axis player some "results", i would rather opt for a HQ more than less instead of another Expensive Unit. But i will let you better find out by testing yourself soon. i'm not a good player.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaMonkey Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Yepper, HQs are definitely "where its at". Get a couple extra and identify your choke points, ie strategic locations and deploy them there. Now you have an ever ready base of operations to snuff out enemy incursions. Helps to develop your infrastructure a level or two so that those op moves into those zones don't cost too much as it usually is the aircraft units you want in there first. After the threat has been disposed of, you'll get the same savings when moving them back to your continuing planned operations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowenw Posted January 25, 2010 Author Share Posted January 25, 2010 Yepper, HQs are definitely "where its at". Get a couple extra and identify your choke points, ie strategic locations and deploy them there. Now you have an ever ready base of operations to snuff out enemy incursions. Helps to develop your infrastructure a level or two so that those op moves into those zones don't cost too much as it usually is the aircraft units you want in there first. After the threat has been disposed of, you'll get the same savings when moving them back to your continuing planned operations. SNUFF, you stole my word SeaMonkey, you did not know what it meant until I used it yesterday:confused:, get your own word will you, now everyone here will think your in your sixty's:rolleyes:. I never use enough HQ's in my SC games, I will try them and see if I can do better as you say at clogged points, good idea for a change. Bo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaMonkey Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Sorry Bo, I operate in spongenomics(my word), absorbing all the good things I witness other people doing and learning from the collective intelligence of billions. Something is to be credited to everyone, even you have not lost your usefulness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts