Daimyo Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I think he means upper and lower hull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M Hofbauer Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Originally posted by traemyn: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Lanzfeld: Do we get upper and lower armour values? Please don't tell me that this is another step back. I see Top and Bottom hull armor values, are you talking about something else? </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanzfeld Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I just don't understand that as computers game technology advances we are stepping back in detail everytime they release something new. 1. No house entry 2. No smoke 3. No upper vs. lower hull stats 4. No crew MG jamming 5. No motars (yet anyway) 6. No user placed trenches 7. No C&C BTS.....Are you sure you REALLY want to back this product??? I am jumping the gun a little and I will try the demo but I tell you...Why is this happening??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Txema Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Is the angle of impact of the shell taken into account in the armor penetration calculations? I hope it is taken into account, if not a lot of excellent tanks with well sloped armor will be very badly simulated... Txema Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolColJ Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Originally posted by rune: RMC, say it with me, the data is placeholder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce70 Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 It may be that the damage model includes more detail than is made available to the player. I can imagine that in the future every variation in armour thickness and quality over the entire vehicle will be modelled, but would you really want all that info in the short description of the vehicle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirocco Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I wish people would wait for the demo before making a judgment on the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce70 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 You shouldn't make such wishes, it will only lead to disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pad152 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 MG Ammo Unlimited? - I don't see an ammo amount shown for any MG!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fritz of Norway Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 hi, I'm new here, and i joined just to be pickey uhm, the optics on the Tiger was made by Carl Zeist, and....it had a guarantee from Carl Zeist to hit target aimed at up to 1000 meters...that means: 100% probability of a hit/kill on first shot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traemyn Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Zeiss Tiger 1 Optics information some nice info for curious minds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomm Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 I smell sig line material!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cincinatvs Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Originally posted by Txema: Is the angle of impact of the shell taken into account in the armor penetration calculations? I hope it is taken into account, if not a lot of excellent tanks with well sloped armor will be very badly simulated... Txema Yes it is taken into account (confirmed on the Russian forum) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrAL Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Some answers: 1) HMGs have limited ammo. Every weapon has limited ammo according to historical data. 2) Speaking about armor, bottom and top of the hull have proper armament as it was on real tanks, the same with turret and every part of the tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Txema Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Originally posted by Cincinatvs: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Txema: Is the angle of impact of the shell taken into account in the armor penetration calculations? I hope it is taken into account, if not a lot of excellent tanks with well sloped armor will be very badly simulated... Txema Yes it is taken into account (confirmed on the Russian forum) </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmar Bijlsma Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 If I may make a suggestion, please rename some of the units to something more clear and concise. The Hetzer for example has an incredibly unwieldy and confusing name. Panzer Jaeger 38(t)(PzKpfW 38(t))anti tank SPG on Skoda LT-38 mod 1938 base tells me the same thing thrice and a half times, it's too much. Naming it: PzJgr 38(t) Hetzer anti tank SPG would suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daimyo Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 As far as I know, "Hetzer" was never an official name for PzJgr 38(t). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirocco Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Originally posted by Daimyo: As far as I know, "Hetzer" was never an official name for PzJgr 38(t). The name "Hetzer" was intended for another design, but it was erroneously applied to the Jagdpanzer 38 by the Czechs, and then appeared in strength reports, so it has some validity, in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan K Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Originally posted by Fritz of Norway: hi, I'm new here, and i joined just to be pickey uhm, the optics on the Tiger was made by Carl Zeist, and....it had a guarantee from Carl Zeist to hit target aimed at up to 1000 meters...that means: 100% probability of a hit/kill on first shot... Yeah well I joined a few weeks ago not to be picky but I rekon 100% hit probability is utter rubbish. Sure the optics are great but you need to consider the person using it and also the environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traemyn Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Originally posted by Nathan K: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fritz of Norway: hi, I'm new here, and i joined just to be pickey uhm, the optics on the Tiger was made by Carl Zeist, and....it had a guarantee from Carl Zeist to hit target aimed at up to 1000 meters...that means: 100% probability of a hit/kill on first shot... Yeah well I joined a few weeks ago not to be picky but I rekon 100% hit probability is utter rubbish. Sure the optics are great but you need to consider the person using it and also the environment. </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolColJ Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Carl Zeist - isn't that the lens mid to high end Sony Digi cams get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M Hofbauer Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 for those who still didnt get it: nobody anywhere ever got Zeist opics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomm Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Originally posted by M Hofbauer: for those who still didnt get it: nobody anywhere ever got Zeist opics. Molenaar Optics Gerolaan 63 A ZEIST 3707 SH Nederland "Zeist Optics" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M Hofbauer Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Originally posted by Rollstoy: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by M Hofbauer: for those who still didnt get it: nobody anywhere ever got Zeist opics. Molenaar Optics Gerolaan 63 A ZEIST 3707 SH Nederland "Zeist Optics" </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flanker15 Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 So... are there going to be more units in the full game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts