Peter Cairns Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I am putting this in more as a topic for possible CM:SF scenarios, but I've noticed that fighting has flaired up in Mogadishu between the militias of Muslim Clerics who seem to be forming some kind of Islamic state, and a loose grouping of warlords who like things as they are. This could be a scenario wher the US finds itself with another Taleban. In the early years most Afghans welcomed the Taleban with open arms as they brought and end to the chaos of the power vacumn that followed the soviet withdrawal. Which side should the US back if any, The clerics who seem to be at least bringing some order and stability but who are probably pro Iranian and might harbour AQ, or the warlords who are responsible for the Chaos. as they did by using the Northern alliance in Afghanistan. Current doctrine is to prevent failing states and help rebuild those that have failed, but what if the people doing the rebuilding won't be allies..... Peter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpl Steiner Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Peter, Do you think the US would go back to Somalia after the events of 1993? I know that after 9/11 anything is possible, but I have my doubts that any US president would order troops back there. The political ramifications would probably outweigh any foreign policy ones IMHO. Still, I can't wait to use CM:SF to simulate some Somali engagements, past, present or future! "Black Hawk Down" is one of my favourite movies, and I really enjoyed the book too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Cairns Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 So where does the "war on terror", pre-emption and hunting down AQ go, if it's clear they are in mogadishu but he US won't do anything about it. If they were to flaunt there presence, what option would the US have but to act, if they didn't they would look weak or scared. Peter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellros Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 If it became blatantly obvious that there are terrorist training camps or such being set up in Somalia, I have no doubt that the US would either send in air/cruise-missile strikes against them, or send in strike forces of some sort to eliminate them on the ground and take prisoners. However, I really doubt we'd go back into Somalia for a long-term occupation (a la Iraq). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oren_m Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 Interesting, i have just read in a news site that an Islamic militia group has offerd cease fire to the group of buisness men and arm dealers who contorls Mogadishu. Oren_m 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Cairns Posted March 27, 2006 Author Share Posted March 27, 2006 US Special forces strike could be a good basis for scenarios. I wonder of Co-play would let you have eight slots, 3 US players and five Militia, but with the militia able to fight each other as well as the US. I don't suppose BF have thought about the possibility of three way fights, as it's hardly an everyday occurance. Although not un heard of in peacekeeping it rarely happens, factions may shift etc. but you usually fight one or the other not both at once on a CM scale. Peter.. Peter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moronic Max Posted March 27, 2006 Share Posted March 27, 2006 US Special forces strike could be a good basis for scenarios.Really? It seems to me that'd involve fewer people, at least on the US side, than would make for compelling gameplay. I may be underestimating the small-scale fidelity of CMx2, however. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Cairns Posted March 28, 2006 Author Share Posted March 28, 2006 Well if we are talking about player slots down to squad, then in theory if each player had three or four teams only, then a company could have ten players. Even if we had a platoon level command, with some supporting units, a company could still have six players, which isn't bad. I like large games, but my experience on on line games tends to be that after about six or seven players it's pretty common for people to have to drop out after a while leaving gaps. True, the AI could take over, but It's not always the same. Peter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.