Liam Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 I think we should have an event to protect the English Isles a little better than they are. Germans attack across the Channel with 3 Fighters and kill the UK.. Fact is, without LR, the Germans historically did attack across the channel, but with Radar the RAF had as many fighter aircraft active as the Germans did in most cases! For they could refuel, rearm, and take off again fast fast fast.. plus the Brits bailed out over home territory more often than not and the Luftwaffe pilots were lost to prisoncamps and labor cleaning off RAF Airfields. Without LR researched I purpose that the Luftwaffe in 1940 is hampered from operations Event effect, reducing the effectiveness of the Luftwaffe attacking England. take away say 30% of their effectiveness and a boost to the English in their Morale, because it's unlikely she will get a natural one, though historically she was determined with Prime Minister Churchill and the imminent danger of Sea Lion to fight off the Attacker.. in other words I'm purposing a way to make a defense possible or at least costly to the Germans enough to think twice as it isn't now Sort of like Winter Effect in USSR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Ranger Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 raise the air defence of armys (and armor?) Problem solved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desaix Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 I am still not getting passed the terrible square grid to play the game regularly but when I read this, I think a naval mod like the one I did for the version 1 should solve the problem... England had a very strong navy that would have been able to greatly delay and disrupt the Sealion... In SC2 like in SC1 the navies are underrepresented in numbers of ships... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sombra Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 Liam, were I kind of agree is reduce the effectivness for ALL airfleets with increased range from their homebase. The effective combat time of an airplane fighting at its maximum range is limited (fuel etc.) Being able to refuel and rearm in short notice. Example with range 6 an figter should be able to fight at its max range only with 50% efectivness. At rnage 3-4 with 100%. With increasing LR tech for example 4. The fighters than can fight at range 5-6 with 100% effectivness and and at range 10 with 50%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blashy Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 Desaix, try my mod, the navies in terms of cruisers and battleships are represented accordingly with the historical total divided by 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jollyguy Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 Blashy; I intend to try to your mod soon. Right now I'm playing the Invasion of Russia mod and having a blast. For some reason I didn't think I'd enjoy it, but gotta tell ya, they are fun, and a nice change of pace, too. The Battle of Russia reminds me of the Panzerblitz games my brother and I would play all weekend. It's tactically oriented, no operating, and gobs and gobs of units. I'm looking forward to my next turn (I'm the Russians), and also enjoying not knowing what to do, not having a cookie cutter to fall back on. Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted August 11, 2006 Author Share Posted August 11, 2006 Sombra brought up a good point, armies-tanks-corps that manuever lose combat effiency when they engage finally, from their origin? Why not Airfleets the further out they engage.. that is of course more math for HC but in fact realistic. His equation would really underpower them to zilch.. noone would buy many of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 "Oh my God I trust in thee" --- Jackson, the American sniper in Saving Private Ryan. [ August 10, 2006, 09:27 PM: Message edited by: jon_j_rambo ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted August 11, 2006 Author Share Posted August 11, 2006 Nothing is more asesome than sniping a man in the forehead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 Jackson bought it with a tank round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konigs Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 Yep, hard to win against a tank with a rifle, he took his share before buying it though, can ask no more or no less for a soldier in battle. If there is hell on earth, it has to be in war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts