Kingfish Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by John D Salt: Contrast this with German practice, where the infantry gun and anti-tank companies were numbered 13 and 14 even in two-battalion regiments where companies 9 to 12 were missing. It appears this practice didn't carry over into the Heer Pz Divisions, at least according to Zetterling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfish Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by John D Salt: Contrast this with German practice, where the infantry gun and anti-tank companies were numbered 13 and 14 even in two-battalion regiments where companies 9 to 12 were missing. It appears this practice didn't carry over into the Heer Pz Divisions, at least according to Zetterling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John D Salt Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by simovitch: I thought they used "I" coy instead of "J" coy? :confused: You're right, I'm wrong, I'll go back and change it. I can't remember who it is who misses out "I", but it isn't the US Army. All the best, John. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John D Salt Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by simovitch: I thought they used "I" coy instead of "J" coy? :confused: You're right, I'm wrong, I'll go back and change it. I can't remember who it is who misses out "I", but it isn't the US Army. All the best, John. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by Kingfish: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by John D Salt: Contrast this with German practice, where the infantry gun and anti-tank companies were numbered 13 and 14 even in two-battalion regiments where companies 9 to 12 were missing. It appears this practice didn't carry over into the Heer Pz Divisions, at least according to Zetterling. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Originally posted by Kingfish: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by John D Salt: Contrast this with German practice, where the infantry gun and anti-tank companies were numbered 13 and 14 even in two-battalion regiments where companies 9 to 12 were missing. It appears this practice didn't carry over into the Heer Pz Divisions, at least according to Zetterling. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.