jpinard Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 July 18 - New bumpy grass textures posted. I'd like to see people's comments on them. 1. Better than the game defaults? 2. Better than MadMatt's grass? 3. Good/Bad for seeing elevations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KiwiJoe Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 When I 1st used the bumpy textures I thought they didn't look as good and were quite patchy and ugly. But I kept it because its FAR better for seeing elevations. Now I'm used to it I went back to the old 1's just to see the difference. The old 1 looks so plain its damn right horrid. Use the bumpy 1, its takes some getting used to but its worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpinard Posted July 19, 2000 Author Share Posted July 19, 2000 Were you using the latest bumpy textures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KiwiJoe Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 No. They are too dark, not to my taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 jpinard, Hey man, I've got an uncle named Joe Pinard, and another named Jim Pinard. Any relation? There can't be that many Pinards around... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 I know where to get the best grass...huh?...oops...wrong grass ------------------ The names Ash, Housewares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juju Posted July 19, 2000 Share Posted July 19, 2000 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jpinard: July 18 - New bumpy grass textures posted. I'd like to see people's comments on them. 1. Better than the game defaults? 2. Better than MadMatt's grass? 3. Good/Bad for seeing elevations? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> 1. Not better, just different. Question of taste, really... 2. See 1. 3. In a sense: It has only three different tiles, so you'll be able to spot the difference between high, middle and low, but virtually nothing in between. The brush in the new pack looks very good, so do the treebases. Maybe a bit too dark, the woods bases, though. 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pillar Posted July 20, 2000 Share Posted July 20, 2000 I like the original ones, but the new ones are far too dark. Take a look at Colin Chungs webpage, he's good with judging how things should look at different light levels. www.geocities.com/coolcolj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts