STAGEMAN Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 (edited) Just preordered too anything eastern front is a must buy gotta say George I loved your von Schroif campaign better then some of the BF campaigns I’d say can’t wait I need it now! Edited October 22, 2022 by STAGEMAN 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vergeltungswaffe Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 7 hours ago, George MC said: The setting The setting - Ogledow a view looking east - Ogledow is rear, left of centre. Looking west - Ogledow is rea, centre right. Action shot! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 6 minutes ago, Vergeltungswaffe said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 11 hours ago, George MC said: The setting The setting - Ogledow a view looking east - Ogledow is rear, left of centre. Looking west - Ogledow is rea, centre right. Action shot! George, what are in your opinion the most objective accounts of the fighting for Ogledow? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George MC Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 5 hours ago, Aragorn2002 said: George, what are in your opinion the most objective accounts of the fighting for Ogledow? In short no objective account. I found numerous on-line accounts of this action. Many of them would appear to be based on, or heavily reference, an account published on Battlefield.ru which could be found at the link below though it appears its now broke... The Soviet view of the Ogledow action referencing primary sources:http://www.battlefield.ru/royal-opponent.html A slightly more detailed overview of the Ogledow engagement and includes some original sketch maps showing the locations of KOd tanks. It appears to be heavily based on the original Battlefield.ru accounthttp://tankarchives.blogspot.com/2013/07/king-tigers-at-ogledow.html Discussion querying loss rates in this action:https://www.feldgrau.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11435 This link takes you to an account which attempts to debunk the whole action, I’ve added it here for err, ‘interest’:https://elgri.livejournal.com/10845.html What happened to the captured Tiger IIs from Ogledowhttp://www.battlefield.ru/was-tiger-really-king.html My own notes and summary: German tank losses in this action – three Tiger IIs destroyed - on the 12th August are confirmed by German records, but further losses in the next day or so are more challenging to reconcile with Soviet claims. That’s not to say the Soviets did not KO or capture the tanks they claimed they did, just from my research it is difficult to corroborate these claims. Thomas L. Jentz (‘Panzertruppen Vol 2’) states that 501st had 45 Tiger IIs on strength by 7th August 1944 and in ‘Germany’s Tiger Tanks – Tiger I & Tiger II: Combat Tactics’ page 153 gives a situation report that shows by the 21st August the unit had ‘only’ lost six Tiger IIs as total write offs, whilst 12 were in need of repair. Schneider in ‘Tigers in Combat I’ on page 46 confirms that the 501st lost three Tiger IIs on the 12th August 1944 and indicates that on the 13th August – “Heavy fighting and further losses. 1 tank – Tiger 002 – is captured intact by the enemy.” The German losses are noted and challenged in the Battelfield.Ru article where the author notes –“Jentz's figures are doubtful. On the battlefields near Ogledów, Mokre, and Szyldów, twelve King Tiger tanks were left behind. From the [Russian} archive records currently available, it appears that the 501st Battalion was routed…” It is worth noting that the German records for the 501st would appear to be contradictory as several authors provide slightly different numbers for the 501st for the end of August 1944. For example, Dennis Oliver in Dennis Oliver (‘Tiger 1 and Tiger II’ page 5) gives 501st as having 41 Tiger IIs on strength with 26 combat ready by the end of August 1944 having lost 4. Whilst Thomas L. Jentz (‘Panzertruppen Vol 2’) states that 501st had 45 Tiger IIs on strength by 7th August 1944 and in ‘Germany’s Tiger Tanks – Tiger I & Tiger II: Combat Tactics’ page 153 gives a situation report for the 31st August 1944 as 13 complete write-offs; 14 operational; and 18 in need of repair for total of 32 Tigers. Reconciling kill claims and operational tanks is always a challenging (futile?) exercise given the various factors common to both sides such as over inflated kill claims, incorrect reports, vehicle accounting systems combined with different definitions of when a tank is ‘knocked out’. What is clear is that the combat record of the 501st during this and subsequent actions in the Sandomierz bridgehead was generally unimpressive. Possibly due to the original battalion being all but destroyed attempting to hold back Soviet attacks during Operation Bagration. Such catastrophic events would mean few of the experienced crews would survive to help form the cadre for the new unit to be rebuilt around. The 501st was reconstituted on the 14th July 1944 with the new Tiger IIs but this only gave the whole unit around a month to reform and train on the new vehicles, and as a combat unit, before being sent into action – perhaps therein lays the reasons for the lacklustre performance of the new tanks and their crews through August 1944: • after the heavy losses in June 1944 the reformed 501st consisted mainly of new recruits without combat experience and lack of thorough training due to the short time between being reformed and sent into combat; • serious technical problems with the new Tiger IIs (final drives in the vehicles being especially prone to failure, especially if the driver was inexperienced); • lack of experience with the new tanks and their strengths and weaknesses combined with overconfidence and overestimation of what the weapon system could achieve, especially the thick armour, often resulted in poor reconnaissance measures and a resultant poor tactical handling. The 501 st’s record through August 1944 was so poor that on the 22nd August 1944 Major von Legat was relieved of his command. It is also reported that he had links to the 20th July 1944 conspiracy to kill Hitler. On the 21st December 1944 the battalion was redesignated as schwere Panzer-Abteilung 424. It is worth mentioning that the Soviet 6th Guards Tank Corps did not have significant numerical superiority during this action. Referencing Battlefield.ru’s account – “It had the following operational tanks to face the German III Panzer-Korps assault: nine T-34-76's from the 53rd GTBr (GMc Note: Oskin’s tank appears to have been a T34-85 according to most accounts), and nine T-34-76's and ten T-34-85's from the 52nd GTBr. The 51st GTBr, positioned to the north, had eleven T-34-76's and four T-34-85's. At Staszów there were eleven JS-2 heavy tanks, and one JS-85 heavy tank from the 71st Independent Guards Heavy Tank Regiment.” Crucially and in marked contrast to their German opponents from the 501st all their crews were seasoned and experienced armoured combat veterans. The high level of professionalism of the Soviet tank crews ensured they made excellent use of reconnaissance, took full advantage of the terrain and the tactical opportunities it afforded and ensured excellent tactical handling at all levels of the unit. Hope this helps? 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ts4EVER Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 (edited) Looking forward to the Ogledow campaign, especially because I made a map for this exact area for the Forgotten Hope 2 Mod for BF2. Due to the gameplay limitations of that engine, it is scaled down a bit, but the general look is similar: http://forgottenhope.warumdarum.de/fh2_maps.php?map=51 Edited October 23, 2022 by Ts4EVER 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 (edited) On 10/22/2022 at 3:38 PM, George MC said: In short no objective account. I found numerous on-line accounts of this action. Many of them would appear to be based on, or heavily reference, an account published on Battlefield.ru which could be found at the link below though it appears its now broke... The Soviet view of the Ogledow action referencing primary sources:http://www.battlefield.ru/royal-opponent.html A slightly more detailed overview of the Ogledow engagement and includes some original sketch maps showing the locations of KOd tanks. It appears to be heavily based on the original Battlefield.ru accounthttp://tankarchives.blogspot.com/2013/07/king-tigers-at-ogledow.html Discussion querying loss rates in this action:https://www.feldgrau.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11435 This link takes you to an account which attempts to debunk the whole action, I’ve added it here for err, ‘interest’:https://elgri.livejournal.com/10845.html What happened to the captured Tiger IIs from Ogledowhttp://www.battlefield.ru/was-tiger-really-king.html My own notes and summary: German tank losses in this action – three Tiger IIs destroyed - on the 12th August are confirmed by German records, but further losses in the next day or so are more challenging to reconcile with Soviet claims. That’s not to say the Soviets did not KO or capture the tanks they claimed they did, just from my research it is difficult to corroborate these claims. Thomas L. Jentz (‘Panzertruppen Vol 2’) states that 501st had 45 Tiger IIs on strength by 7th August 1944 and in ‘Germany’s Tiger Tanks – Tiger I & Tiger II: Combat Tactics’ page 153 gives a situation report that shows by the 21st August the unit had ‘only’ lost six Tiger IIs as total write offs, whilst 12 were in need of repair. Schneider in ‘Tigers in Combat I’ on page 46 confirms that the 501st lost three Tiger IIs on the 12th August 1944 and indicates that on the 13th August – “Heavy fighting and further losses. 1 tank – Tiger 002 – is captured intact by the enemy.” The German losses are noted and challenged in the Battelfield.Ru article where the author notes –“Jentz's figures are doubtful. On the battlefields near Ogledów, Mokre, and Szyldów, twelve King Tiger tanks were left behind. From the [Russian} archive records currently available, it appears that the 501st Battalion was routed…” It is worth noting that the German records for the 501st would appear to be contradictory as several authors provide slightly different numbers for the 501st for the end of August 1944. For example, Dennis Oliver in Dennis Oliver (‘Tiger 1 and Tiger II’ page 5) gives 501st as having 41 Tiger IIs on strength with 26 combat ready by the end of August 1944 having lost 4. Whilst Thomas L. Jentz (‘Panzertruppen Vol 2’) states that 501st had 45 Tiger IIs on strength by 7th August 1944 and in ‘Germany’s Tiger Tanks – Tiger I & Tiger II: Combat Tactics’ page 153 gives a situation report for the 31st August 1944 as 13 complete write-offs; 14 operational; and 18 in need of repair for total of 32 Tigers. Reconciling kill claims and operational tanks is always a challenging (futile?) exercise given the various factors common to both sides such as over inflated kill claims, incorrect reports, vehicle accounting systems combined with different definitions of when a tank is ‘knocked out’. What is clear is that the combat record of the 501st during this and subsequent actions in the Sandomierz bridgehead was generally unimpressive. Possibly due to the original battalion being all but destroyed attempting to hold back Soviet attacks during Operation Bagration. Such catastrophic events would mean few of the experienced crews would survive to help form the cadre for the new unit to be rebuilt around. The 501st was reconstituted on the 14th July 1944 with the new Tiger IIs but this only gave the whole unit around a month to reform and train on the new vehicles, and as a combat unit, before being sent into action – perhaps therein lays the reasons for the lacklustre performance of the new tanks and their crews through August 1944: • after the heavy losses in June 1944 the reformed 501st consisted mainly of new recruits without combat experience and lack of thorough training due to the short time between being reformed and sent into combat; • serious technical problems with the new Tiger IIs (final drives in the vehicles being especially prone to failure, especially if the driver was inexperienced); • lack of experience with the new tanks and their strengths and weaknesses combined with overconfidence and overestimation of what the weapon system could achieve, especially the thick armour, often resulted in poor reconnaissance measures and a resultant poor tactical handling. The 501 st’s record through August 1944 was so poor that on the 22nd August 1944 Major von Legat was relieved of his command. It is also reported that he had links to the 20th July 1944 conspiracy to kill Hitler. On the 21st December 1944 the battalion was redesignated as schwere Panzer-Abteilung 424. It is worth mentioning that the Soviet 6th Guards Tank Corps did not have significant numerical superiority during this action. Referencing Battlefield.ru’s account – “It had the following operational tanks to face the German III Panzer-Korps assault: nine T-34-76's from the 53rd GTBr (GMc Note: Oskin’s tank appears to have been a T34-85 according to most accounts), and nine T-34-76's and ten T-34-85's from the 52nd GTBr. The 51st GTBr, positioned to the north, had eleven T-34-76's and four T-34-85's. At Staszów there were eleven JS-2 heavy tanks, and one JS-85 heavy tank from the 71st Independent Guards Heavy Tank Regiment.” Crucially and in marked contrast to their German opponents from the 501st all their crews were seasoned and experienced armoured combat veterans. The high level of professionalism of the Soviet tank crews ensured they made excellent use of reconnaissance, took full advantage of the terrain and the tactical opportunities it afforded and ensured excellent tactical handling at all levels of the unit. Hope this helps? According to Werthens Geschichte der 16. Panzer-Division only 8 Tiger II's took part in the attack on the 12th (or 13th?) of August. A typical example of German overconfidence in their own skill in armored warfare. Although the losses were not uncommon for that period of the war in the East. Do we know which supporting elements (from 16. Panzer Division) were available? Edited October 24, 2022 by Aragorn2002 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arjuna.R Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 On 10/22/2022 at 9:34 AM, STAGEMAN said: Just preordered too anything eastern front is a must buy gotta say George I loved your von Schroif campaign better then some of the BF campaigns I’d say can’t wait I need it now! I remember finding it very hard! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerKommissar Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 (edited) Staszów? Szydłów? Will they appear in the Battlepack? I have fond memories of fierce battles, between those two towns. That county was the main setting of Iron Front: Liberation 1944 (later ported to Arma 3). Edited October 24, 2022 by DerKommissar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 26 minutes ago, Arjuna.R said: I remember finding it very hard! Welcome to the Eastern front! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George MC Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 1 hour ago, Aragorn2002 said: According to Werthens Geschichte der 16. Panzer-Division only 8 Tiger II's took part in the attack on the 12th (or 13th?) of August. A typical example of German overconfidence in their own skill in armored warfare. Although the losses were not uncommon for that period of the war in the East. Do we know which supporting elements (from 16. Panzer Division) were available? The action the Ogledów covers is very specific to in and around Ogledow. There was a great deal of fighting in the whole sector but the campaign focuses on a few square km around Ogledów. Numbers were hard to pin down as both sides do not tally. However the following extracts from the designer notes and their source I've listed below: From the designer notes: "One of these units, the 501st Heavy Tank Battalion, commanded by Major von Legat, was a source of German great expectations. After being destroyed in fighting during the earlier stages of Operation Bagration, it had been reconstituted at Ohrdruf on 14th July 1944 and equipped with the new Tiger IIs. On the 5th August 1944, the 2nd and 3rd companies totalling 31 Tiger IIs (the 1st company with an additional 14 Tiger IIs did not arrive at the front until the 12th August 1944) of the 501st entrained bound to join Army Group North Ukraine. Their combat debut proved very inauspicious, as after detraining, most suffered final drive breakdowns while on a 50 km road march. After a supreme effort by the mechanics twenty Tiger IIs were available for immediate combat. This mechanical unreliability was to plague the unit throughout its future combat operations ." ‘Tigers in Combat I’ by Wolfgang Schneider "For this operation 16th Panzer Division, with the 501st and 509th Heavy Tank battalions attached to it, was divided into two main kampfgruppen - Kpf.Gr “Bloemecke” (reinforced Pz.Grn.Rgt 64 – I Bat (mot) and II Bat (gep)); and Kpf.Gr “von Busse” (reinforced Pz.gren. Rgt. 79). " Source ‘Fire Brigades: The Panzer Divisions 1943-1945’ by Kamen Nevenkin "The 501st Heavy Tank Battalion (consisting of 2nd and 3rd companies) was now down to only eleven operational Tiger IIs out of the twenty it went into action with twelve hours before - due to on-going mechanical issues with the new vehicles.2 However this did not affect the morale of the Tiger crews of the 501st who were very confident that their new Tiger IIs would be more than a match for the Soviets in their lighter armoured and armed T-34s. " Source: ‘Germany’s Tiger Tanks – Tiger I & Tiger II: Combat Tactics’ by Thomas L. Jentz At this point I should stress and note that when reading through these accounts there are some discrepancies that can be troublesome to reconcile with other sources (although detailed German accounts of this action are scarce to non-existent it would appear). The key one is the date in the Battlefield.ru account is incorrect – this is then repeated in other versions/retellings of this action. To confirm - the action/ambush occurred on the 12th August 1944. This is confirmed in several Soviet sources, including Guards Junior Lieutenant Oskin’s commendation for ‘Hero of the Soviet Union’ which states that the date of the action he was famously involved in was the 12th August 1944. The reference you mention most likely pertains to this action on the 13 August 1944. At 0900Hrs on the 13th August the 2nd TBn, the 2nd Tank Company of the 71st Independent Guards Heavy Tank Regiment, and the 289th Rifle Regiment from the 97th Guards Rifle Division3, began moving toward ZARAZ (just over 1km north west of OGLEDOW). King Tigers which were positioned west of Ogledów, blocked the attacking infantry with gunfire. A platoon of JS-2 tanks, led by Lieutenant Klimienkov, advanced and joined in the battle. Soon one of the German tanks was on fire, and another one was knocked out. The infantry, without opposition, then moved into Ogledów, where tanks of the 3rd TBn were already eliminating the remaining Germans. Later in the day seven Tiger IIs moved in from the direction of Mokre. An IS-2 belonging to Guards Senior Lieutenant Udalov opened fire at 800 meters, destroying two Tiger IIs, one of which also caught fire. The German tanks retreated, regrouped, and advanced on PONIK. Lieutenant Belyakov's IS-2 was in ambush in that direction. Opening fire at the column from 1000 meters, he set fire to one Tiger II. The rest turned back. Thats most of what i found. As I said reconciling numbers of tanks etc at specific times and places was nigh impossible. So educated guesses were made where exact/differing numbers were given. Hope this helps? Cheery! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George MC Posted October 24, 2022 Share Posted October 24, 2022 1 hour ago, DerKommissar said: Staszów? Szydłów? Will they appear in the Battlepack? You mean the towns? No. They are mentioned in various briefings but I did not create any scenarios with the actual places on map. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtsjc1 Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) https://www.helion.co.uk/military-history-books/tank-battles-in-east-prussia-and-poland-1944-1945-vilkavishkis-gumbinnen-nemmersdorf-elbing-wormditt-frauenburg-kielce-lisow.php I know this book covers actions in this same area. I got it a few months ago but haven't read it. There are mixed reviews due to the fact it uses Russian sources. Does anyone have a good or bad review of it? Thanks in advance. I have a couple of the books George mentioned and the 3 volume From The Realm Of A Dying Sun books. Edited October 25, 2022 by jtsjc1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commanderski Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 12 hours ago, jtsjc1 said: https://www.helion.co.uk/military-history-books/tank-battles-in-east-prussia-and-poland-1944-1945-vilkavishkis-gumbinnen-nemmersdorf-elbing-wormditt-frauenburg-kielce-lisow.php I know this book covers actions in this same area. I got it a few months ago but haven't read it. There are mixed reviews due to the fact it uses Russian sources. Does anyone have a good or bad review of it? Thanks in advance. I have it, read it and used it for my Tank Battle of Lisow scenario. It's really a decent book. It does cover some aspects of the battles from the German side. The main reason for having more Soviet information is that there isn't much information from the Germans due to incomplete records from them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinkin Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) Edited out. Edited October 25, 2022 by kevinkin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artkin Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 On 10/23/2022 at 6:05 AM, Ts4EVER said: Looking forward to the Ogledow campaign, especially because I made a map for this exact area for the Forgotten Hope 2 Mod for BF2. Due to the gameplay limitations of that engine, it is scaled down a bit, but the general look is similar: http://forgottenhope.warumdarum.de/fh2_maps.php?map=51 Forgotten hope was sick. I only played the first. The second never had the same amount of content as the first 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Modernrocco Posted October 30, 2022 Share Posted October 30, 2022 Trick or treat 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ts4EVER Posted October 30, 2022 Share Posted October 30, 2022 16 hours ago, Artkin said: Forgotten hope was sick. I only played the first. The second never had the same amount of content as the first By now it is the other way around, I would say. But let's not further spam this with offtopic stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Seven weeks since pre-order. Where are you waiting for, Battlefront? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warts 'n' all Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 7 hours ago, Aragorn2002 said: Seven weeks since pre-order. Where are you waiting for, Battlefront? Multiple choice question. A. For Hell to freeze over. B. Christmas. C. For "It'll be ready when it's ready" to arrive. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Warts 'n' all said: Multiple choice question. A. For Hell to freeze over. B. Christmas. C. For "It'll be ready when it's ready" to arrive. I was hoping for a reaction by George MC, but beggars can't be choosers, I guess. Edited November 1, 2022 by Aragorn2002 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sttp Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Aragorn2002 said: I was hoping for a reaction by George MC, but beggars can't be choosers, I guess. Hasn't George said that his part was basically done, but that (apparently) the Battlepack's not going to be released until the new multiplayer features were complete? I may have misinterpreted something though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George MC Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 58 minutes ago, sttp said: Hasn't George said that his part was basically done, but that (apparently) the Battlepack's not going to be released until the new multiplayer features were complete? I may have misinterpreted something though. Aye that's correct. I've completed my part but as the Battlepack has to be incorporated into a patch/new exe for CMRT its in the pipeline whilst (I suspect) other work relating to a patch etc is completed. As the battlepack will available on steam I'd expect that there is most likely also work to do in this regard on Slitherine's side. All of this behind the scenes stuff is beyond my paygrade though 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artkin Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 I hope something good is in the works. If the only thing that releases is a tournament feature then I have to say "Who asked for this?". That's only if it's taking this much time for JUST the tournament feature. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesertFox Posted November 2, 2022 Share Posted November 2, 2022 On 11/1/2022 at 7:31 AM, Aragorn2002 said: Seven weeks since pre-order. Where are you waiting for, Battlefront? Makes you wonder about the consumer benefits of preordering something. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.