Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?


Probus

Recommended Posts

On 9/25/2024 at 12:55 PM, Beleg85 said:

Not really; I am fully aware of dirt (and low quality of it) that Poroshenko camp is throwing at president. Most of my Ukrainian contacts are rather apolytical, some even Maidan participants. Two are completelly cynical at literally everyone in UA politcial class (they did respect only Zaluzhny), claiming they all betrayed original idea of Revolution of Dignity. Both Zelensky's and Poroshenko's parties alike.

Also most insightful observers of internal UA politics seem to support this view that power there is not wielded by one guy and his personal sympathies/antypathies. Zelensky is not a puppet (he also get more matured over course of this war...but also more tired) but neither he is single player.

My only point here is to be aware that Ukrainian political decision making is not as monolitical as headlines in many western newspapers assume. It's not only about Z's and his ideas/actions. We can agree though that recent stance in US elections is considered quite risky. Just on principles, nobody likes if other country meddles in his own election process; many in Ukraine get that even if they hate Trump and his stance regarding Ukraine.

There is almost no regime where 1 person makes all decisions, not in a dictatorship let alone a democratic country. The prime minister/president is responsible and has the final call (in theory), but that's not to say it's a one man show.
Media might paint pictures in certain ways, one should be able to see through the framing. 

Even Trump has his advisors :D

Edited by Lethaface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2024 at 3:18 PM, The_Capt said:

Zeleban had a different pattern but same goal - build some credibility and then switch to pro-Russian defeatism. Posing as a Ukrainian gave this more weight to outside readers "if a Ukrainian thinks it is that bad..." Zeleban was far more ham handed about it - the war was supposed to be a complete loss by now- so maybe tactics are evolving. We will see Eug85 brushed up on all out defeatism last week - Ukrainian officers etc, but then pulled back once called out.  Moved onto "West Sux" etc. Regardless, the news is never good "always bad" is the primary theme to watch out for. 

 

In the beginning he was/seemed different, he even took it up for Kraze against my righteous conclusions :D and later he seemed rather stressed out. Quite a while after that he became the defeatist. 
There could be many explanations, compromised account being one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2024 at 3:37 PM, Eug85 said:

News is not good or bad. It is objective.

LoL, that depends. 

Anyway I have felt, since I called your posts fishy, that you are withholding something from us. You never post what it is you actually want to bring forward. You are only fishing for certain reactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2024 at 4:25 PM, The_Capt said:

I would argue that exploring whether we are looking at a pro-Russian Info Op on this thread is directly relevant to this war. It speaks to the fact that the "front line" of this thing extends into the information domain. Even right here, right now. The primary vehicle of influence coming out of Russia is to sew disunity. Unity in the West has stopped Russia cold in this war. It was the last thing Putin expected. We are supposed to be lazy, weak and divided. Whoops. 

We are not perfect but unity happened. Losing that hill, Russia is falling back on Resolve. Attack our resolve in this war directly - it is too hard, too long, a lost cause...just like Iraq and Afghanistan. From this position Russia can try to re-attack that unity. This is not new, people have written books about the Russian way of hybrid warfare since the Revolution:

https://www.amazon.com/Russian-Hybrid-Warfare-Resurgence-Politicization/dp/0190877375

The trouble here is that observation is not inherently a good or bad thing (I think you said that), but that is not where it stops. Analysis and Assessment it where the influence happens. We can both observe something - A Canadian Film, Finnish trade trends, Ukrainian military leadership. But once you offer opinions, which is a post-processing action, we enter into conation spaces. If your analysis and opinions are genuine, and backed up by facts, then we should all be able to see that. If they are skewed and promoting biased...well that is bad.

So What? Well Russian information operations are very well developed. We have seen plenty of evidence of that. They also happen in layers. First circle are actual Russian agents - working in national security/intelligence. They have legal frameworks and do strategic stuff. Second degree are paid assets, normally developed by agents from the first circle. Third circle are organizations and affiliations that receive Russian money but indirectly, often through various convoluted means. Fourth circle are really spontaneous volunteers with no real direct connections but are out pushing pro-Russian narratives in support of a larger cause. They lack any real training but have mass. Thousands of kids with internet accounts pounding drums across the information space. 

I have zero doubts we have seen 4th circle players on this thread. They are everywhere. But 3rd? Hmm. Why this matters so much is that Putin has got one thing right, war is still largely a mental game. He knows the West is tired of trying to solve the Worlds problems for 30+ years. He can still try and salvage this car crash if resolve fails. I am convinced the continuous offensive slaughters the RA are doing are pretty much a show for Western consumption. "Dear God, they are willing to just keep coming." Watch enough of that and just about anyone is going to start to wonder. He promotes and reinforces this because he really has very few options left. He is losing this thing so badly that his only real option is to "hope" we get tired and quit. 

I'm out of likes, don't have much too add but I think you hit an interesting and valid topic here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2024 at 6:20 PM, Kraft said:

Man, and someone claimed I am the person poisioning the wells in this thread😄

Beware, the russian niche 15 reocurring user gaming forum thread psyop.

But movie from russian military embedded, RT employed ethnic russian directors only showing rus POV? Lets not jump to conclusions, might be anti-war😂 

Don't be surprised. For what it's worth, there are known small destabilization campaigns on social media with specific targeting. A niche gaming forum is indeed a less probable target for destabilization on large scale, but given the reach / views of this thread and the contributors it could very well be a target in some way shape or form. If only to get more info about people which can be exploited further with other means. '4th' grade / hasbarah type agents are not to be neglected either, they exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why I have to read walls of text piling on Eug85? Nothing he is posting is against the rules of this forum and the pushback is frankly inane. People here are intelligent enough to make their own minds up after nearly three years of analysis so please if you don't have something intelligent or interesting to say then don't say it. 

"I don't like what you say and therefore you are a russian troll" is not an argument. The only person who can make that judgement is Steve so if you are not Steve please post thoughtful arguements or genuinely new information rather than pages and pages of spam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Russians seem to be improving their drone game. This looks like a prototype that may develop into something effective. Although I'm not sure how it is better than a simple FPV - maybe they think it can shoot from outside the jamming bubble around a tank?

Overall I think that it took over 18 months but the Russians are slowly developing a system to develop and deploy drones that is actually effective. Not as effective as the Ukrainians but definitely more worrying than cratering empty fields with 152, especially since a combination of artillery, glide bombs and drones is more than the sum of it's parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2024 at 12:37 AM, Vet 0369 said:

I have to agree with and support LLF in this. I personally can’t stand either one and won’t be giving my vote to either one! I think Trump is a Tyrant and I’m terrified that Kamala will ignore the text of the U.S. Constitution even though she has to swear the save oath to “Preserve and Protect the Constitution from all enemies both foreign and Domestic” that all Federal employees have to swear. I am a Constitutional Originalist. Does that put me in in the MAGA camp also?

No, but not knowing much about Harris how did you come to the conclusion that she will ignore the US Constitution? From a foreign, NL, perspective the likelihood of Trump ignoring your constitution is much higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, hcrof said:

The Russians seem to be improving their drone game. This looks like a prototype that may develop into something effective. Although I'm not sure how it is better than a simple FPV - maybe they think it can shoot from outside the jamming bubble around a tank?

Overall I think that it took over 18 months but the Russians are slowly developing a system to develop and deploy drones that is actually effective. Not as effective as the Ukrainians but definitely more worrying than cratering empty fields with 152, especially since a combination of artillery, glide bombs and drones is more than the sum of it's parts. 

Lmao, Google lens is what they used to translate the second picture. Its so good that it can translate russian cursive from ww2 documents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2024 at 4:14 AM, Battlefront.com said:

Let's not forget the Danes.  I posted an interview with the PM and she was talking explicitly about NATO needing to have its own red lines.

Me thinks there's some coordination here!  Perhaps based on some intel that Russia might be signalling a specific means of escalation.

Steve

Another one, for what it is worth. This has been posted about by the regular media here. Without going into what my take on it is, I think it's best to just translate the origin:

https://www.liga.net/ua/politics/interview/zsu-naisylnisha-armiia-yevropy-shcho-na-zakhodi-dumaiut-pro-viinu-ta-chervoni-linii-putina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the Ukrainian diaspora, would it not be a good idea to get them enlisted remotely as drone operators? If US drones can bomb people in the Middle East from a trailer in Nevada, why can't properly vetted Ukrainians in Western Europe do the same to contribute? They would probably be more useful as drone pilots than they would as meat puppets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...