Jump to content

Will Shock Force 2 Receive new modules?


Recommended Posts

On 1/13/2021 at 4:14 AM, Bufo said:

Hope not.

1 sided battles are just not that fun.

Unless RAF are ported in... on the NATO side of course :D

I think very many CMSF2 owners would pay for a Russian module. From a technical perspective most of the RAF is already there from CMBS, just need to be reskinned for the desert and have their tech knocked down to 2008 levels. Or not, I wouldn't mind them in with all their 2017 tech. It's a fictional conflict already, why not! 

Edited by Homo_Ferricus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Homo_Ferricus said:

Unless RAF are ported in... on the NATO side of course :D

I think very many CMSF2 owners would pay for a Russian module. From a technical perspective most of the RAF is already there from CMBS, just need to be reskinned for the desert and have their tech knocked down to 2008 levels. Or not, I wouldn't mind them in with all their 2017 tech. It's a fictional conflict already, why not! 

The RAF are already in CM:SF2 (in the UK Module), but they are not AFAIK in CM:BS.  :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Homo_Ferricus said:

Unless RAF are ported in... on the NATO side of course :D

I think very many CMSF2 owners would pay for a Russian module. From a technical perspective most of the RAF is already there from CMBS, just need to be reskinned for the desert and have their tech knocked down to 2008 levels. Or not, I wouldn't mind them in with all their 2017 tech. It's a fictional conflict already, why not! 

There is a Mod!! Link to youtube.  On the you tube page, below the video there is a link to the download.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I'm a little late to the party on this one, but I wanted to say I would definitely buy more SF2 modules, whether that's a smaller battle pack or a major expansion pack. 

Realistically, it's difficult to see what could be added while staying within the constraints of the game setting but I'd be open to anything that BF wants to try in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna say no. I never liked how sf2 felt and therefore it is probably my least played title, ironically it's also the one with the most content. It just feels like the same game, doesn't feel anywhere near as smooth as the other, newer CMx2 titles. It's cool though. I ain't mad

For instance: when swapping through scenarios or maps quickly in the editor it will crash. Especially with large files. I can beat the **** out of cmbs and never have an issue

Edited by Artkin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/24/2021 at 7:30 PM, Sprocketman said:

I'm a little late to the party on this one, but I wanted to say I would definitely buy more SF2 modules, whether that's a smaller battle pack or a major expansion pack. 

Realistically, it's difficult to see what could be added while staying within the constraints of the game setting but I'd be open to anything that BF wants to try in this regard.

Turkey comes to mind as it is a NATO member and where the factions from the NATO module start their drive into Syria from. Plus now we have M60s in engine with CMCW, so their armor already exists in the games. 

Israel would also be another choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...