Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I read that, and all of his other books.  He was scathing in his criticism of Monty in this one, saying Monty only did this to get all the resources back under his control.  Arnhem could've worked I suppose -- if they had another two or three weeks of planning instead of basically one week.  but they didn't have that time, so it ended up just not being well enough prepared or thought out.  Some say it couldn't have worked, others say it could have, but it was a plan where everything had to go right in a lot of different places -- the very definition of a risky plan.  Demolition of Arnhem or Nijmegan bridges, for example, would've doomed the whole operation in an instant.   Though certainly a damn fun one for us history buffs & wargamers!

 Just read James Holland's Normandy.  Waste of time unless you are new to the subject, I learned nothing new from it.   But Holland is more forgiving of Monty, at least in Normandy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...