Jump to content

How I view most scenarios and the designers...

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MikeyD said:

Iraqi forces retaking Mosul were in no mood to accept surrenders anyway. I'm reminded of Polish forces fighting under the British in Normandy. They had no mercy for anyone wearing anything resembling an SS uniform, which had unfortunate consequences for captured German tankers in their black uniforms.

CTS were pretty well behaved from what I can make out, even Counterpunch gave them a clean bill of health and that was after the retaking of the western half of the city.....The PMUs on the other hand were not so disciplined. 

As I've said many times before.....Poor bloody Mosul.  :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hmm. Instant resort to ad hominem attack, plus entirely fanciful assertion that I have spent significant time commenting on your posts seems... faintly familiar. Mr. Tittles, is that you?

A number of revamped CMSF2 scenario briefings did get condensed to be more concise. I'm one of those who get intimidated by 'wall of text' orders, myself. Other orders got expanded. The purpose of ord

For purposes of my argument below I'm defining the following terms as: Tools - Units given the player to fight the engagement. Parameters - Map size, time limits, objectives etc, the variabl

Posted Images

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...