Abdolmartin Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 The GL and M-25 accuracy buff, and the air-launched missile trajectory update, are very very awesome! Thanks for the update gentlemen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiter Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Thank you for the patch. There is still some issues, for example soldier moonwalking and silly QB auto purchase. Please fix it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacroix Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Thank you for the patch. There is still some issues, for example soldier moonwalking and silly QB auto purchase. Please fix it. very unlikely to be fixed on this engine. cmx3 maybe 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiter Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 QB mech inf, auto buy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IICptMillerII Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Thanks for the update! Big list of changes, and all good stuff. Can't wait to give it a go. Thanks again! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fade2Gray Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Is it just me, or does the game feel a good bit more optimized now? I even jacked up the graphics a couple notches after a few games, and I swear it plays smoother than before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jspec Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Another thanks for the update post! Looking forward to checking things out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiter Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Is it just me, or does the game feel a good bit more optimized now? I even jacked up the graphics a couple notches after a few games, and I swear it plays smoother than before. I have noticed the same. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 (edited) One thing for sure BMPs are now nasty .. A BMP-2M got 4 bradleys before being killed by a lowly AT-4 in the last turn. The gunner and thé infantry commander survived to receive the praise. All medium to long range cannon kills. Another got 2. It was 8 against 8 . 6-3 for the BMP-2M against the Bradleys. It was usually the contrary before the patch. In another game, BMP-2Ms killed 2 Abrams and heavily damaged/mission killed another two. Edited May 3, 2015 by antaress73 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacroix Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 (edited) I have noticed the same. runs same on my pc (gtx 970 +4690k 3.9ghz turbo boost) , i decided to play all cm games on fastest or faster and /Improved textures, aa: off ,vs:off, High priority process:off (gives smoother keyboard/mouse reaction). i was looking at 3 battalions (US) and i had 60-40 fps, its totally different feeling. giving orders in 60 fps, smoothness outweights 'bad' graphics. This game's realistic settings is faster models and maybe best textures (not sure about how much we can push textures yet), AA is Luxury here ,should be off, not to mention supersampling, thats sci fi. VS and other minor things dont count for much in most cases i see same pattern everywhere, developers (and i am not attacking them) want to have beautiful games , but in reality they cant (unless you think 15-35 fps is playable) , i can understand that , but from now on i ll just play realistically , on fastest/faster + improved. FPS > graphics Gameplay>looks Edited May 3, 2015 by Lacroix 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieme(ITA) Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 (edited) Could someone please confirm that the BMP-2M model works 100% right in 1.3 patch? The modernized equipment looks transparent to me, might be something about my mod but removing it doesn't solve the problem, so I'd like to ask you here if your BMP-2M model looks correct. Reported here : http://community.battlefront.com/topic/119440-13-patch-and-bmp-2m/#entry1605517 Edited May 3, 2015 by Kieme(ITA) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 (edited) Could someone please confirm that the BMP-2M model works 100% right in 1.3 patch? The modernized equipment looks transparent to me, might be something about my mod but removing it doesn't solve the problem, so I'd like to ask you here if your BMP-2M model looks correct. Reported here : http://community.battlefront.com/topic/119440-13-patch-and-bmp-2m/#entry1605517 I confirm. Bmp-2M becomes a vanilla bmp+-2 when you get closer than 10 meters or less. I reinstalled your mod to no avail. Edited May 3, 2015 by antaress73 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red2112 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Thank you BF Team, thats alot of work, thanks! Care, Red 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akd Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Could someone please confirm that the BMP-2M model works 100% right in 1.3 patch? The modernized equipment looks transparent to me, might be something about my mod but removing it doesn't solve the problem, so I'd like to ask you here if your BMP-2M model looks correct. Reported here : http://community.battlefront.com/topic/119440-13-patch-and-bmp-2m/#entry1605517 Looks like the first LOD got switched out, probably an inadvertent result of some other correction made to BMP-2 family models. Shadows use another LOD, so that is why they still appear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rinaldi Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Wow you guys are working hard and fast, thank you so much! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stagler Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Finally, harsh winds or blowing leaves are no longer a threat to comrade tankist. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerdwing Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 One thing for sure BMPs are now nasty .. A BMP-2M got 4 bradleys before being killed by a lowly AT-4 in the last turn. The gunner and thé infantry commander survived to receive the praise. All medium to long range cannon kills. Another got 2. It was 8 against 8 . 6-3 for the BMP-2M against the Bradleys. It was usually the contrary before the patch. In another game, BMP-2Ms killed 2 Abrams and heavily damaged/mission killed another two. Thank God! Finally, realism!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacroix Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 Thank God! Finally, realism!!!!!!!!!!!!!! is this a bugg? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hister Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 is this a bugg? No, the gameplay balance for those vhicles was fixed with this patch. BMP's are now supposedly more on par with their real world performances. Antaress played it right and was able to score a very good result with his BMP's while it was harder to do so before the patch. I can't say if the way vehicles perform is similar to real life counterparts or not since I have no exprtise in that field. Someone more knowledgable will have to jump in on this one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieme(ITA) Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 The change in ammunition type for the BMP-2M is a key feature. Before the patch the BMP-2M had very hard time penetrating a Bradley front armor, while the BMP-3 favoured shooting AT missiles to enemy IFVs at most ranges. The changes made the BMP-2M capable of penetrating Bradley with ease and the BMP-3 now favours its best weapon to deal against enemy IFVs, the 30mm gun. Therefore BMPs now are much more lethal than before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) And the infantry commander manning the panoramic sight now communicates the info to the gunner instantly.. Greatly improving spotting and engaging times. A BMP-2m or BMP-3 lying in ambush against moving Bradleys or M1s will now usually get the jump on them Edited May 4, 2015 by antaress73 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canada Guy Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 I noticed that the ammo count for the Stryker 40mm Grenade Launcher overlaps with the title of that ammo. I cannot see the amount of ammo that it currently has for that weapon. Were other ammo types given expanded names that now conflict with the amount of ammo? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 (edited) A company of M1A2s (14 tanks, including 5 with APS) frontal attack over 3.5-4km of open steppe terrain.. 3 krizanthemas hull-down on a hill... they kill 6 M1A2s.. damage another and the crew bails out.. 7 are left... The Kriz lose two (Ihad to move them a little and they got detected) and the remaining retreats downhill because no more ammo (but 4 kills). 20 T-90AMs who were waiting at the bottom of the hill get into hull down positions.. 7 were hit over the course of the battle by M829A4s where there is relikt coverage .. only one penetrated. A T-90AM survived two hits on the frontal upper hull because of relikt. It is very effective at 3.5km (6 out of 7 rounds stopped). I lost three T-90AM (two weapons mount penetrations and a relikt fail). They killed the remaining M1A2s. When lased they had time to back off and get out of harm's way ... Two had their 7.62mm mount destroyed by sabot rounds (close call). Shoot and scoot. The russians were typical (some green crews, many regulars, and 1-2 veteran). The US were also typical ( a few crack, many veterans and a few regulars). Total tally for that US frontal attack long range slugfest at 3.5km... 13 US tanks destroyed, one mission kill and abandoned and 1 Bradley for 2 Kriz and 3 T-90AMs destroyed. The T-90AMs won 7-3 at that range against the M1s. The russians were definitely broken before patch 1.03. Now they are nasty. Who needs the Armata ? They just upgrade the 900 T-90As to the AM standard (like they said they would do, read that on a russian site) and they should be okay. Edited May 6, 2015 by antaress73 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud Backer Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 That's proof that I don't know what I'm doing with the Russians. Started a new game against a U.S. opponent in Pbem and have lost 1/3 my force and I think I have not killed 1 thing. Grrrrrr 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 (edited) My opponent thought he could M1 me to death Sometimes luck plays a role but you need to make the odds work in your favor. You need specific conditions for the Russians to be dominant but they can be ! But before the patch I would have had a much harder time with Relikt bugged and all. Edited May 6, 2015 by antaress73 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.