Jump to content

The map split gives an unfair advantage to the US


Recommended Posts

The choice to split the map through the middle of the USA has always seemed bizarre to me. This split gives an unfair advantage to the USA in that to defeat the USA one has to attack it from both the east and west coasts. All other countries can be defeated by an attack on just one front. Why wasn't the map split done down the international date line so no country is split and therefore no unfair advantage. All land based transfer arrows would be eliminated.

While you're at how about making the sea based transfer arrows fairer. Currently axis units that come through the Panama canal have to travel south across the equator before they can go north to the west coast!

Why are the sea based transfer arrows exclusive to either allies or axis anyway? Why not make avaiable to either side just like reality?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one:

The choice to split the map through the middle of the USA has always seemed bizarre to me. This split gives an unfair advantage to the USA in that to defeat the USA one has to attack it from both the east and west coasts. All other countries can be defeated by an attack on just one front. Why wasn't the map split done down the international date line so no country is split and therefore no unfair advantage. All land based transfer arrows would be eliminated.

While you're at how about making the sea based transfer arrows fairer. Currently axis units that come through the Panama canal have to travel south across the equator before they can go north to the west coast!

Why are the sea based transfer arrows exclusive to either allies or axis anyway? Why not make avaiable to either side just like reality?

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. That particular longitude was about the only one around the globe which saw no combat. Splitting along the Dateline - in the middle of the Pacific War - would be insane, and would make about as much sense as splitting along the Prime Meridian through Greenwich.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the international date line is that it passes through an area that was fought over, so dividing it there would cause complications, whereas as the USA wasn't fought over, and is the least likely area in the game to be fought over, dividing it there is less likely to cause any issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so you have answered my first question, although if the war doesn't play out as the real one did (and that's the point of the game isn't it?), then the US does come in to play and then the land based transfer arrows detract from the game.

Now how about an answer to my second and third questions about the sea based transfer arrows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well since you've asked so nicely ;)

That's a good question regarding some of the arrows and looking at them now they look like some of them could certainly be amalgamated between the Axis and Allies.

With Breakthrough we did add a new feature that a loop arrow could be used by ANY country and this will be more helpful for future map designs.

I hope this helps,

Hubert

Link to post
Share on other sites

While you're at how about making the sea based transfer arrows fairer. Currently axis units that come through the Panama canal have to travel south across the equator before they can go north to the west coast!

Just a quick heads up that I've just changed this on my end as suggested and we'll test it out but I think there shouldn't be any problems with this change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...