Jump to content

Rooks And Kings

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rooks And Kings

  1. Sorry I'm swamped with work and I wasn't able to withdraw from the tournament.
  2. Sure, if you need me to look at anything specific in this latest batch let me know and I can get back to you with details on it.
  3. Fair enough! Happy to help if it was a bug Took some trial and error but once you understand how it works the CSV is a really simple process. Don't have any negative feedback about it.
  4. This was made using the Fight Club version and I was able to edit the CSV's to recreate light infantry Ukrainians with Javelins and AJAX support against Donovians.
  5. I would be willing to vet people within the community and submit actual feedback and data in an organized effort to beta test and compare the tradeoffs.
  6. Not sure which version of CM:Pro this is, and if it's a newer version than what I have access to then I will agree with you. However, in it's current state of the version I have it does work in singleplayer and UK: Fight Club shares replays of their singleplayer missions from the Campaign of Learning to add more analysis to AAR's. (Battlefront Edited Statement. Disregard above point) I will agree with you on this. I understand the rigors of dealing with a community that comes across as ungrateful and whining consistently while continuing to enjoy the products you deliver. This is what I suspected the issue was, and I completely understand this. There's no real way to navigate that and I won't pretend to understand the inner workings of your business or contracts. I will say that on my side there was a similar situation, and it was spun as a PR positive "In collaboration with XYZ" and a conversation was had that was positive on both sides. This may or may not make sense for you, and again I respect your judgement. I never questioned your business strategy/model. There's a reason you're still here after two decades. Just some food for thought is all I wanted to approach you with. I think the net positives (Pro Clients willing) far outweigh the negatives and could help shift the momentum in a positive way towards the future. One thing to keep in mind is that a lot of the feedback you hear is from a sample size on the forums. There are communities out there with hundreds of people on the new social platforms that aren't represented as well on the forums. I look forward to the future sir.
  7. Everything you listed requires more development time vs. a feature that already exists. I won't argue your priorities though. Fair enough.
  8. All of the gameplay footage in this video is from the Replay Feature.
  9. I don't know the technical workings behind it, but having used the replay feature and being a video editor myself while maintaining an active presence in the discord community of over 200+ people who have bought at least one of your titles throughout the years you've been in business I have to disagree with your assessment. Regardless of all the miniscule little complaints that are petty themself, the community as a whole would appreciate this one specific feature more than anything else. Enough to probably pay an additional fee (albeit small, $10-$15) to have this. It's not only useful for your marketing, but the community itself to bring people closer together / create content. Not a single user of Combat Mission: Professional that obtained their license through UK: Fight Club has complained about anything regarding the replay feature. Sure, it's not all sunshine and rainbows and the feature is surely not polished to the standard that you would like to release a finished product in, but as it stands it is more than useable. If there is a contract stipulation on deliverable features that cannot be released to the public, that's one thing. Telling the community on multiple occasions that we think we know what we want, but we really don't is a little rash in my opinion and I mean this with all due respect. My final point, is that if the community is going to find things to complain about year after year, regardless of what you do sir, then why not give them this one thing that they've been asking for so you can either; 1) Prove your point that we don't know what we want, or 2) Throw the community a bone that is appreciated. Either way, I respect your judgement but as a user of both the Pro and Commercial titles I do not think your assessment of the usage in regards to Replay Feature is accurate.
  10. ORBATS are edited with .csv files by text. Cannot be done in commercial but it does exist in Pro.
  11. Awesome! I could never get it to work and neither could people I know. Would you mind sending me the file you use in CMRT? I'd like to give it a look.
  12. Just got back into CM. It's still in the works, just slow.
  13. I don't think they necessarily improve over the base game, just giving new players the ability to have more teaching moments. Also updated version fixing some AI plan issues. https://uploadify.net/f63013068217b5b5/CMBS_TRG_PACK.zip
  14. Absolutely. AT&T textures are being implemented as we speak! Lol In all seriousness, it starts with the SEAL reconnaissance for the ranger bn assault and we're going to try to make it an interesting scenario other than the usual "recon til you get shot at"
  15. Here is a set of 3 scenarios designed for new players. https://uploadify.net/50fe3cb9c0a24f51/CMBS_TRG_PACK.zip
  16. For some reason I can't edit the thread or post so I'm replying here until Elvis deletes it like I requested. In hindsight, battle pack 1 was a bad choice of words. I meant to present it as a Community Battle Pack much like the community scenario packs for other CM titles and CMO. This is simply a community made campaign with love and passion poured into it. Nothing to do with Battlefront in any official capacity. I apologize for the confusion. I am simply an idiot it would appear lol.
  17. I'm a huge fan of John, but all I see here is him implying that Ukraine received parts, and unoperable or outdated aircraft that may have transferrable parts to modern platforms in order to get their damaged airframes back into a combat status. I don't think this is related to any F-16 hopefuls out there.
  18. You should discuss your thoughts with Ssnake from ESim Games.
×
×
  • Create New...