Jump to content

Wiggum15

Members
  • Posts

    537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Wiggum15

  1. Why should someone that likes the game but remains critical leave the forum ? No go on and ignore me, live in your wonderland where there is nothing about CMx2 that should be improved.
  2. So i have a question to BFC. Why did you not update the unit pictures in the UI with some that fit the Bulge ? I kills my immersion instantly. I hope you agree the UI looks pretty dull, did you update it for the final release ? @ sburke Yes, thats the place for such things, not this thread its about discussing the game ! Its like discussing Donald Trump here or Fallout 4, its just Off-Topic.
  3. Things like lying in the open while cover is near, taking strange routes (ignoring your WP's) and exposing themselfes, Tank crews who attack crack infantry with their pistols...the list goes on. So a bit illogic behavior with fire and smoke is not that huge.
  4. Merry Christmas! :ph34r:

  5. This forum is really funny... A customer has a complain and something he wants to talk about and gets spammed with infantile pictures and told "say something positive or shut up"...classic. You think the Normandy unit pictures in the Bulge game are great he ?!
  6. I never stated that, now back to topic please.
  7. I think my point is valid enough to be discussed, stop spamming the thread with oversized pictures.
  8. Sorry that i remain critical and keep an eye on details.
  9. They already dont react in a logical manner many times (although AI trigger slightly improved that).
  10. Depends, i think if it has a very unique "Bulge" feeling to it maybe. But looking at the UI and especially the unit pictures "straight out from normandy" most likely no. I just cant feel the dedication to deliver a product that feels full-fledged. If they would introduce many Bulge related new artworks and details (buildings/ vegetation) make to UI artwork distinctive, finaly give us new and better weapon and engine sounds and show me they put work into details like the unit pictures i would most likely buy, money is not a problem for me.
  11. Iam just in the process of scrolling through the manual, i think the UI looks very uninspired and the unit pictures look like straight out from normandy, not even snow in the background. That really kills the immersion.
  12. Sorry, thats not a "merry Christmas" thread, its a discussion about the future of CM !
  13. Sorry but: "our plan is to spend 2016+ expanding our current titles with more modules and packs." In my opinions this sounds like they plan to use the CMx2 engine till their retirement. I mean, how old is the Battlefront staff 50+ or 60+ ? Looks like they dont have the guts anymore (yes such a step takes guts) to lift CM onto the next level (new engine)...CMx3. So yeah, in 2017 we will get CMx2 4.0, then modules and new games then maybe CMx2 5.0 but nothing new, nothing that challenges us again and lets us play the game in a new sophisticated way. Where have your visions gone ?
  14. What about "Combat Mission: Ride of the Valkyries" ? CMRV ...everything is better then "Final Blitzkrieg", sorry awful name in my opinion.
  15. I predict the end of January 2016 (more precisely the 22. January) !
  16. It is game related, i and many other suffer from bad framerates although we have a power pc !
  17. Still, should be doable if Battlefront wants to make it happen.
  18. I to think the name is unnecessary confusing. My suggestions: Combat Mission: Battle of the Bulge (CMBB) Combat Mission: Final Gamble (CMFG) Combat Mission: Fire and Snow (CMFS) Combat Mission: Nuts ! (CMN)
  19. The problem with quick battles was always the AI. Even when defending they made silly choices, standing in the open, not using trenches, tanks up front... Thats why i never had fun playing QB.
  20. Why do you call waclaw a troll ? He has created great sound mods for CMx2 that improve the dull and lifeless "ever the same" standard sounds in CMx2 games ! Everything changes like in new textures + a few new formations ? What exactly changed gameplay wise since CMBN 1.0 ? Not much if you are honest. Just look at the UI ! Its the same since 2007, with a bit added patchwork. Its does not even scale correctly...what are the big improvements you and all the others talk about ?
  21. Wow, yeah you need to support poor BFC...mean people that spend hundred of dollars on their games since 2007 are on there forums asking for new gameplay features in their new 55$ game...
  22. Whats wrong with the 2016 Toyota Camry ?

  23. I highly doubt these additions would be unprofitable per se. The only reason they could be unprofitable are: 1. To get these features you would need a new engine because you know it can not be done in the CMx2 engine (see infantry movement and formations) You think further development of your vision and goal to provide the best squad level 3D wargame is not worth the work and time and money. If you had a vision you could have done a Kickstarter campaign long ago to see how much support you could get for it but instead you fixate on releasing texture and scenario packs with few ported over "old" features. Sorry iam not happy with that, where is your vision and enthusiasm ?
×
×
  • Create New...