Jump to content

Abbasid111

Members
  • Posts

    159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Abbasid111

  1. It's amazing how many myths are still out there regarded as gospel. Almost to a man German generals writing their post-war memoirs blamed their defeat on Uncle Adolf. Not one that I have read have ever admitted that the Russians learned from their mistakes and simply got better and better at warfare. 

    Even Napoleon at Leipzig said of the allies arrayed against him 'these dogs have learned something'

  2. HI Sublime, it just seemed to me after a few games where the map size matched the battle size that an increase in map size was in order. More room for the forces to move around and not always a head to head slugmatch.

    I have done quite a few battles in assault and attack modes. That seems more realistic for an attacker/defender urban fight. For more open, ie non-MOUT terrain, I do like probe but I will do Meeting Engagements if that is what my opponent wishes.

  3. 2 hours ago, JonS said:

    It warms my heart to see Cooper's "analysis" and opinions given the respect they deserve.

    All credit to the man for his service in NWE. Seriously.

    No credit whatsoever for his book and windbagging.

     

    Edit: that's not fair. Writing any book is hard work, and I expect that one was an uncomfortable emotional journey for him. I just wish he'd have stuck to what he personally had seen and done and experienced. A book that long about the ins-and-outs of the role, functions, and organisation of the ordnance units within an armoured division could have been, would have been, fascinating. The bits of that which are in his book are great. Sadly they're few and far between.

    +1

    If Cooper had just stuck with what he had seen and experienced and the actual wartime functioning of armor maintenance units instead of editorializing about things above his pay grade he would have come up with a much better book. 

  4. Much of my tank warfare reading has been from Commwealth sources over the years since I am a big North Africa and Brit operations in Europe fan.

    It seems to have been standard practice, or it occurred so often that it seems like standard practice, that an unwounded troop or squadron commander would attempt to take over the nearest tank to him.

    Just the commander mind you, not the entire crew being replaced. I am not sure how often an entire crew got replaced in the middle of a battle. I have not come across a single example in my reading. Usually the crew of a knocked out tank was treating their wounded and trying to make it safety not trying to hijack another tank.

  5. I don't know about the CM1 campaign system since I am only familiar with the current CM2 games. Usually you have a core group or unit that you command through the campaign. Sometimes other attachments to your core command will appear and you won't always have your total command together in every battle.

    A lot of campaigns advance depending on how well you did in the previous battle. If you win you play battle A but if you lose you play battle b.

    Also check out user made mods, scenarios and campaigns. fortress Italy is one of my favorites out of the WW2 titles.

  6. The nice thing about the CM2 series is that whatever new features are developed for one game they get patched, we they are applicable, to other games in the series.

    As far as where to start it depends on where your interest lies. If you are an ost front guy then Red Thunder, covering Operation Narration, is the game for you. If you are a west front kind of guy then you have CMBN, or Final Blitzkrieg. 

    If you like sun baked rolling hills and an earlier start (1943) then it is Fortress Italy.

    The biggest bang for the buck, IMHO, is the CMBN Big Bundle. You get the base game, the Commonwealth and Market-Garden modules, hours and hours of play.

×
×
  • Create New...