Jump to content

Panzerpanic

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Panzerpanic

  1. Yeah , i did one test with that in mind where t80b where getting sot by m-150: (only 1 test for now) No matter where the tank is getting hit, be it turret to lower hull(all frontally), be it pen or no pen, the track will always get damaged. It feels weird. I personally that it should be like that for near miss with arty. What i don't know is , should i tank take damage to its tracks when its getting hit by an atgm on the turret?
  2. Reading all that, im suprise of the prevalence of the t62.
  3. I too was confused to see them as i just read the manual where it said that they were not employed by the soviet in Germany. Great little mission btw! It feel so weird fighting with the Starships. Quick question: where does one go to see the TOE of the Warsaw pact and Nato army at that time
  4. Wait didn't Czechoslovakia / Poland / Romania had a small ish number of t72 ?
  5. Do you guys fight with your (soviet) tank buttoned down or buttoned? Also for people that know more about soviet tactic of the time, what do TC should do in battle?
  6. For the USSR, are those FM and the book of Glantz deal with small details like does the tankers fight button up/down?
  7. Thanks for answers guys. I'm gonna try that @MikeyD!
  8. While doing a defense quick battle against the AI , i had some weird feeling seeing m113 without inf inside and footman running alone. After that game i did some QB test run with the scenario author test against a mechanized soviet battalion and each time at the deployment, all the infantry started outside their IFV/APC. I did those tests on huge and large map and did it from meeting engagement to assault , with BMP ad BTR and the result was always the same. I would like to know if its a bug, in intended or maybe i'm doing something wrong.
  9. Learn something today! Thanks for the info!
  10. I see on bmp and brdm that some Malyutka are grey while other are green. Is there a reason for that (different version) or its only aesthetical change?
  11. Didn't F&R came out Friday last week?
  12. Maybe for a future west vs east Germany expansion ! Also, a little bit related:
  13. The bunching up can be an issue , when you go company and up, and if the reinforcement is ever included in quick battle (oh i so would like it) i hope it could be included for friendly force and opfor!
  14. The brit dont have missile on their ifv because they really want their tank and atgm vehicles to do the killing of tank. Personnaly i like my ifv with atgm and stab but you do with what you have. I suppose that you could always ask one of your javelin team to ride on top of your warrior ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ !
  15. Fun game. My favourite one regrading the cold war. In the next year we should see Southern storm with the Canadian , French, czech and east germans added to the game. Anyway, my tip to you is to read the manual, it will explain a lot and if you need anyone to play in the future,i could be your man!
  16. Please close this, i will create a ticket. Thanks.
  17. Hi, So to make it short i wasn't able to find my order on my account until i remembered that i have a second one where i'm pretty sure i did all my orders.I tried to login again with that account and it doesn't accept the password. When i try to reset it give me that message :" Can not find specified username and email address in database" with the only two email address that i used with battlefront. I still have the order email as proof and i just want to have the account reactivated. I can PM you for the account information . Thanks
  18. Oh,this will be good! I look foward to see your aar and, as i canadian, see ianL destroy your forces! Seriously your aar are always a thing to look foward too and i hope that both side fight well so that we witness some glorious CCSF moments!
  19. In my experience, bmp 3 make wonderful bomb who can even destroy tank near it. You can say its a good fire support also when it see something.
×
×
  • Create New...