Jump to content

sokulsky

Members
  • Content Count

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sokulsky

  1. Hello there! Would gladly play an MP game as Entente player. Please write me a PM or email me at rafalsokulski@yahoo.com. Best, Rafal
  2. So, yet again, looking for AoC Barbarossa scenario GER player (I'd prefer to play SOV). If you're interested, please PM me.
  3. This scenario seems to be a high quality work and exactly something I was looking for since a long time (First Indochina War just doesn't get enough attention when it comes to the strategy games). Many thanks for this scenario.
  4. Looking for AoC Barbarossa scenario GER player (I'd prefer to play SOV). If you're interested, please PM me.
  5. Regarding taking Leningrad: Seems like a poor idea to be honest. It requires some significant amount of force to do it "on march" in 1941,while you still need to eliminate Smolensk and Kiev defence lines. If SOV player tries to save as much units as possible, you will face very strong opposition in either of those areas and panzers used to assault on Leningrad will be actually a burden, as most of SOV industry is pretty much elsewhere. SOV player saving mech corps can pretty much be a threat in those two areas and can knock out some panzer units and it's really not that hard imo. Even if y
  6. I usually don't pay attention to "reload=1" info if it happens once in a while as crashes tend to happen (besides you can easily cheat this reload check by changing the names of the savegames iirc or just play on the other machine). I think vast majority of the mp players play fair and only once I was in doubt of that. It's a great community really
  7. You have my sword. PS. Don't refer to the Imperial Germany simply as Prussia. Soldiers from Kingdom of Saxony, Kingdom of W├╝rttenberg and Kingdom of Bavaria would feel deeply offended!
  8. Yeah, it's still played online, it has very interesting multiplayer.
  9. Opinion of a player that plays strategy games since about 16 years and mostly multiplayer mode of strategy games since about 7 years. I'm assesing only the multiplayer value of add ons since it's what matters the most and shows game balance the best. In my opinion Assault on Communism add-on offers the best player-vs-player multiplayer SC experience when it comes to WW2 Eastern Front depiction and feeling, it's just awesome and allows many, many viable strategies for both sides. It has also quite mobile, vigorous feeling when it comes to offensives and counteroffensives and multiple deci
  10. Hello there, I've an open spot for 1 game, it can be WW2 or WW1. I've SC Gold with AoC & AoD and SC WWI with Breakthrough PM me if you are interested and propose a scenario. I can go with Axis/Central Powers or Allies/Entente. cheers, Rafal
  11. Hello there, I've an open spot for 1 game, it can be WW2 or WW1. I've SC Gold with AoC & AoD and SC WWI with Breakthrough PM me if you are interested and propose a scenario. I can go with Axis/Central Powers or Allies/Entente. cheers, Rafal
  12. Ok, wasn't sure if Persian corridor (growing importance since second half of 1942) was directly implemented.
  13. SOVIET must-to-do: Invade the Kingdom of Iran as soon as possible, as Tehran and nearby oil fields are worth 40 mpp which helps you to cover your losses and balances the loss of western soviet cities. btw. does conquering Iran affect lend-lease events?
  14. Anyone up for PBEM AoC game? I'd like to play as Russians, standard rules (no "saving&reloading" etc.)
  15. With this ratio of losses, this game looks pretty decided to be honest
  16. I think that the gentleman's agreement is probably the best resolution since engine changes are not possible atm and british sides need some air support at least for recoinessance purpose.
  17. Ok, another game question sparked by my duels with Strategiclayabout: Log story short: We're playing Call to Arms 1914 campaign, I'm playing CP, Strat went with Entente. The sight of pickelhaubes made me happy until I've noticed the ugly effects of ahistorical decision made by Strat regarding Ottoman Dreadnought Sultan Osman, that is to let OE have it instead of seizing it for Royal Navy. The consequence of seizing it is: 1 Battleship for UK and 10 to 15% swing of OE towards CP The consequence of keeping it is: 1 Battleship for OE and 20 to 30% swing of OE towards Entente. I agree
  18. Ok, short story: I'm playing this scenario with Strategiclayabout, my dear multiplayer nemesis when it comes to Battlefront titles Long story short: He went with Brits, I went with Turks, managed to beat his land forces but on turn 25 he put an airship from relief force near Kut and BAM! here comes Major Victory for him and a whip from sultan for me :confused: Q1: What I mean is: Is it supposed to work like that? I can understand a land units support should work - more or less it's 1,000 to 5,000 soldiers when it comes to detachment or brigade, but an airship? They got the post, some s
  19. Yep, similar thing happened to me once with Cavalry being ambushed by a corps - it could move after ambush and I was able to capture A-H capital (Wien). Thought it was a feature of some sort, but it seems this is a bug.
  20. Your best shot would be to start a multiplayer game - it's impossible for AI to match human planning in strategy games, as AI cannot create a complex strategies, it's just good at finding weak spots if it has numbers on it's side. Personally I recommend you a Play by Email game.
  21. Until 1916 France can hardly launch anything anywhere, it's just running after German in technologies and buying back units lost in 1914. Exactly, espescially that German army is used as "sword" on both fronts. You're right, only 3 chits could be put into industry but I'm and I was struggling with putting "just" 3 there for Entente countries anyway. Besides, 3x125 for industry, 1x125 for Inf Tech, 4x50 for trench, 1x125 for Art tech, 1x100 for shells and 75 for Production/Fighters/something else later on and you're ready to rock as Germany as you'll put up more resources int
  22. +1 to the above, altough the issue of kamikaze-french forces was a part of previous SC games as well.
  23. I second this opinion, it's the best WW1 grand strategy cpu game around and with Storm Over Europe add-on, you basically get a SC2.5 included (SC GC isn't as good imo, mainly due to the too small map size (grand offensive is just a few hexes in this or that side...). Haven't played Russian Civil War or Franco-Prussian War but they look tasty and with WW1 Vorbeck's Afrika campaign, this game just rocks
×
×
  • Create New...