Jump to content

Boche

Members
  • Posts

    1,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Boche

  1. Well if its that effective in real life...then thats what the game is supposed to represent. Ive fired AGLs at targets almost 1 kilometer away and they spread out but the group was tight, and this was from an AGL mounted on a humvee-like vehicle. And yes I have notied that tripod mounted AGLs shoot a tighter group. They also seem to fire off extremely long bursts. MIx the long burts with almost no accuracy makes them useless.

  2. Yeah i dont like the mk19s in CMSF2 either. The spread is awful. Im playing the CMBS battle pack and some platoons have 3 out 4 strykers armed with mk19s and its just bad. Much prefer the 50 cal. 

    I believe this was addressed some time ago but i dont know what came of it.

  3. Sounds good. I can get started on the lang Vei part...

    I can maanage the contours atleast and finish that soon. Thanks for the sources!

    Good thing about Lang Vei there seems to be alot of photos and maps on how the camp was organized. Ill probably make the map bigger just to fit my own plans for the map but it can always be scaled down to fit the campaign :)

  4. In the end you go to battle with what you have...we in the west "mostly" have the luxury of having a lot of equipment to go about. Its something thats suprised me for a couple of years now, all the video of the tiger forces and the 4th armoured with preety much no standard equipment. Then again thats not everything, You dont have to just look the part, you have to play the part and im sure after all these years these guys know what they are doing. You can tell when you watch them. A plate carrier is nice but combat experience is better.

×
×
  • Create New...