Jump to content

Knaust1

Members
  • Posts

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Knaust1

  1. my card is working fine with v1.03, except for FPS, with those settings posted before excellent graphics and AA on as I posted before in v1.04 horrible human beings at some distance (not at maximum zoom)...very strange indeed!
  2. ...at least on my computer. Nice graphics in v1.03, however with poor FPS. Great FPS in v1.04, however poor graphics: triangular-shaped heads looked at some distance. Is it possible that AA is not working? CMSF parameters Display size 1024x768 VSynch On 3D Model Best 3D Texture Best Alias On High Priority On Graphics card ATI Mobility Radeon 200M series VRAM 128Mb AA 4x AF 16x Vsynch Always enabled Z-buffer 24-bit Triple Buffering On
  3. fully agreed :cool: think of War in the South Pacific for a meager C64
  4. Use smoke while assaulting in clear terrain or while dismounting...let your US troops fire only when in good cover...
  5. Save games created with earlier versions of the game are NOT compatible with v1.03. Please finish your in-progress games before applying this patch. I tried to run a previously saved 1.02 game and it seems to work with v1.03. At least it works with: * Fixes to the "stuck soldier" problem. * Fixes to the "stuck unit" problem. * A new "Show All Move Paths" key added to the Hotkeys Menu. What am I missing at?
  6. I'm going to make up my mind to buy a new computer, on which CMSF will run fast and furious. What combination of processor and graphic card do you advise me to get?
  7. For a customer standpoint of view the fact is simple. Did anyone, who complains about the game, try the demo? Did the demo run smoothly on the pc of his? And in case that the demo ran smoothly, why didn't the game do the same? Battlefront.com encourages you to review the product Demo before making a purchase because ALL SALES ARE FINAL My game v1.02 now runs on an ATI card just the same way as the demo does, but v1.03 is crappy. So I am not complaining at all. [ September 13, 2007, 12:18 AM: Message edited by: Knaust1 ]
  8. btw, how can you see the FPS?...I'm using an ATI card, so sorry for my off topics
  9. hey Madmatt, I ran demo1.02 pretty well...but when I got the game even the Abu Susah scenario was unplayable (game settings at minimum quality). Patch 1.03 didn't aid at all. See my posts. Only with the workaround of Trooper I can get an acceptable performance in the Susah Scenario. As already said, I'm waiting eagerly for cd version 1.01. See my posts ad Knaust and Knaust1(same pal).
  10. shoot...it works also for my crappy ATI 200M series...good FPS maybe this is Aladdin's lamp the overall solution?
  11. if you have version 1.01 you can try to run it with your GeForce 8800...it could be interesting to see if version1.01 runs fine... obviously if it is not cumbersome for you
  12. many...many ...but I never suggested to package the files...
  13. well...I downloaded v1.02 and it doesn't work, while I can run the demo1.02. You can try to upgrade to version1.03 as you can always come back again to v1.01. You uninstall the game and then you reinstall it sitting tight to v1.01. Anyway if you are afraid do not upgrade. Please tell us what comes out. It can be very interesting!
  14. Maybe all this is only stupid or maybe it is worthy to take into consideration. I'm going to think that many troubles are caused by the way the exe file processes the versions. In the game there are 3(4) files in the data folder: version 100.brz, version 101.brz, version 102.brz, (version 103.brz) In the 1.02 demo there is only one file: version 102.brz, looks like a package of version 1.00, 1.01 and 1.02 and this may make the difference, maybe for some faulty symptoms experienced by other players. I can play both scenarios of the 1.02demo fine, but I have horrible FPS in similar scenarios of game 1.02 and 1.03. So why not packaging the versions in the game in the same way as it is in the demo?
  15. what do you mean for older CM games?... can you tell me if you run fine the demo1.02 scenarios?
  16. Thats just becuase not all vehicle textures are needed for the demo, so we removed them to save download. That wont affect frame rate in any way. I just did a check and FPS for me is the same in the origional demo, the current demo and 1.03, providing I used balanced settings in all. Im guessing youve tried all of the various settings under the options menu so at this point Im not sure why you are seeing a significant reduction when most people have seen a slight increase if anything. Does the game look fine in smaller scenarios out of interest? </font>
×
×
  • Create New...