Jump to content

Krull

Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by Krull

  1. Yea, I get it. You're a victim. Honestly, I resent being called a 'whiner' for daring to see the faults in this game along with what's ok. If there are problems with pathing or LOS it doesn't follow that it needs to be scrapped. Also, those that have been very vocal in big-upping this game give themselves way too much credit if they believe that they are responsible for patching. Spare me. Strewth, another guy who thinks he's driving down a one way street with all the traffic going his way........
  2. Yes they have stic. man. Ghost 1 got banned. And at least 3 others are under threat of such. What i'd like to know is if i flag a moderators post who reads that flag?
  3. Is that personal abuse directed at me? Thanks Kharnvor but i can handle it. And i don't hold it against Pvt. Ryan As far as i know the issues are now recognised & hopefully all being worked on.
  4. Who's hating? You're seeing 'the same group of people all over these forums beating the same drum' in proportion to the ammount of replies they receive. One side can have their say but a response by the other is denied? Happy for you that you are pleased with the title. I, and more than a few other individuals are not. But that doesn't seem to be the issue any longer. We made our points already & are happy that the issues raised are being investigated & hopefully patched. All you're seeing currently is a witch hunt by those that have had their backs rubbed up the wrong way by the inconvenient truth & a refusal to let it lie. Constant abuse & snide remarks spread over a good few people so that they don't look too obvious against a few that are obliged to respond in order to maintain their point of view & defend it against BS attacks. The 'whiners' have accomplished their unexpected unfortunate mission in reporting the obvious problems which are acknowledged &, some, being worked on. Funny how we are the 'whiners' when the issues we flagged are acknowledged. We seem to have become 'whiners' because we got in & bought the title as soon as we could. We had first exposure as the paying public in Europe. Now that the problems we flagged are acknowledged there seems to be a refusal by some of this community to let it go. Because there are a vocal majority in these exchanges that knows no better or cares less, as far as i can see, the 'whiners' copped the 'fanboy' gang-bang. Funny how the issues we first raised that were railed against are now being fixed by a patch. Like i've already said elsewhere; i'm not even talking about the titles deficiencies for the last day or so. Just defending myself against those that support the company line & continue to be both rude & abusive on a personal level.
  5. Why can the enemy fire on him then? Why aren't they restricted by the same criteria? Why is it all a one way street for the AI no matter how you try & dress it?
  6. And there, conclusively, we have it. Unless you're going to drop back on the word 'others'. Heh, context speaks for itself....... If you have issues with the the titles lack you are officially a whiner. Good to see you so obviously break cover & show your true colours Moon. Not that they were in much doubt. The problem others have with the 'fanbois' is not the message but how it's presented. Over and over. It's to the point where the original message is long lost, and has been replaced by the sheer fun of stirring up trouble on the board. At least for a few people. So tow the line or else you'll be gone on the most spurious of pretexts. What a totally reprehensible way you, as a BFC reperesentative, treat your paying customers. The game is an obvious ****hole as it is & when that is flagged & the usual 'fanbois' gang-bang the 'dissenters' you choose to side with the 'fanbois' in clear breech of your duty to remain impartial. You got us all lined up don'tcha. BillyBob, Chazman, Krull et al. The most vocal of the 'disenters'. Word up fo yo Moon. We all aint talking 'nonsense'. We be talkin' issues here. Genuine issues which the 'mob' consistently try to beat down. The 'pro' mob wins because it carries favour. The 'dissenters' get banned for trying to fight their corner. We 'whiners' aint repeating any more 'nonsense' than the 'fanbois' be repeating theirs. 'But might is right' right? If you, as a moderator on these boards representing BFC, are going to attempt to pull the wool over eveyones eyes to silence the 'whiners' & have it that it's on the up & up you're going to have to try a damn site harder than the current lemon you're rolling out in front of us. (once in a week is enough, please) You, as a BFC representative, have your point of view & i, as a paying customer, have mine. Just because they aint the same isn't reason to ban any more than the 'mob' responses/abuse to our message. If it's been repeated over & over it is because it is in response to the 'fanbois' repeated rebuttals. Any great imbalance there that you see? Nah, nor me. You repeatedly fight your corner as it is challenged as do i. The fact that we have around 20 or so vocal 'fanbois' sharing the load over the 3 or so 'whiners' not afraid to fight our corner don't much change the respective positions. Other than the vocal minority risk a ban in the interests of fair discourse. All i see you advocating here at this time Moon is ugly mob rule. If we appear to be shouting it is because we are responding. And i aint even talked about title play issues for a day or more on account of they mostly already be out there. But if someone wants to come along on the bandwagon calling me a 'whiner' for my point of view then i will respond. You see the correlation there? 20 - 3? I have to be more vocal, not because i'm in an obscure minority but because you let the 'mob' berate us for our valid comments, talking their **** over & over, yet when we are obliged to respond to fight our corner we are put under sly notice of banning for repeating ours. And there's any wonder that the dissenters are in the percieved minority?? Tell the/your 'mob' to shut up & we'll do the same. No need to go on, the faults are out there for all to see & acknowledged. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'll just remind you of our relationship here on these boards Moon. I'm the paying customer. This is the correct forum for me to air my grievences. You, by dint of your postion, are the company man. My paid for title doesn't deliver what it promises by a long way & i have a paid for point of view. I don't give a toss if you don't like my point of view but i do expect you to remain impartial. Banning myself or the other 2 you have lined up would only serve to highlight how bankrupt these boards would become. Right along with 1C & BFCs reputation.
  7. In my experience, Tontoman, after i've remanned the same ATG it gets targeted. I've remanned the same gun 4 times & had the crews both targeted & killed.
  8. One of the devs needs to come in here & answer this. This is the best post i have seen in relation to the problem. I should care anyways. After a 3 year abstension i'm orf to the much sunnier climes of CM & screw the $53 i consider i wasted. But it's been entertaining doing this in lieu of playing the title. Note: i'm both ambidextorous & multi-tasking enabled.
  9. 'scuse me Moon? I'm not repeating the same 'nonsense' over & over as it was never 'nonsense' in the first place. No need to reiterate what that 'nonsense' is as it's well covered here already by now. But 'nonsense' it aint. Picking up on a 'whining' 'fanboy' projecting the same double standard you seem to endorse is worthy of quoting though.
  10. Because i am not a satisfied customer i am being made out to be a whiner, an idiot that needs to be told why i should like this game. Why should i and others who do not like the faults in this game be chased off by a bunch of self serving and tedious people who think they have a given right to post. So they like Los, LoF, cover, the AI - they like the game - wtf do they want us to do about it. Move over chief, oncoming traffic.
  11. Atta boy, he's been warned on pain of being banned & you judge now the choiset time to get your blade in. Quality.
  12. And teh rabbid fanbois too ya think?
  13. Sure. But if we both getting screwed on an eaqual basis it brings some parity no matter how warped.
  14. to be fair, the encyclopedia is all these people have to go by to judge the authenticity of the game's ballistic values, since apparently they do not have access to these "internal numbers" you are referring to. If the encyclopedia gives other valus than the game uses, then it is both a) 1C/BTS's fault and b)questions the point of having that encyclopedia in the first place. The way it is it seems to be way more of a problem than a feature / aid. authors is rather unspecific. The Dorsch is an author, Im an author, everyone's an author... what kind of kryptic source quoting style is that? and believe me Ive seen a lot of different quoting styles. Zetterling, you mean his work on Normandy or the one on russian tank warfare co-authored with Frankson? While Zetterling surely isnt the worst of works out there, I would definitely trust him more with organizational issues and not with hard technical details. add-on: abovesaid notwithstanding, kudos to you and the work of the BTS/beta team on arriving at rexford/bird values. </font>
  15. Right on blow56. Paying, playing peeps telling it like it is.
  16. You cant even specify whats lacking in the game for you then, or what? </font>
  17. He was getting mobbed & clearly had enough & bit back as far as i saw.
  18. So it seems but having paid good money for this you'll have to get used to me. If the multiplayer worked i'd probably not be here anyway.
  19. If people responded to the negative feedback in a civilised manner there wouldn't be all the BS. The box of which i speak is abstract. It has a multiplayer tab in-game that does not function. Many people have this problem from what i see. Given that playing against the AI doesn't really fly i thought i'd cut out the problem where i could & have at it with a human player. But i can't do that either. In my opinion that means the title is pretty flawed & unplayable. In multiplyer totally unworkable.
  20. The forums i usually hang on would frown upon quoting someone having messed with their words. Quote me if you feel like it but don't quote me having replaced my text with your own. Terrible form old chap.
  21. Well, for me & a fair few others the issues do trash the entire title. Some of the in-game issues can be rectified but i fear others are beyond fixing. The final straw for me was the non compliance of the multiplayer. That's the clincher for me that this was just dumped unworking on the expectant community with the obvious result. Sure i could can the hyperbole but being slackmouthed & labeled a whiner because of giving negative feedback just doesn't bring out the best in me. But i respect your level headed approach, note your membership # and will endeavour to be less aggressive in expressing my disapointment & responses.
×
×
  • Create New...