dennisb55

I noticed they have the wolverine and Jackson but not the Hellcat! And yes the 88Flak would be nice. I can't expect this to be Steel Panthers, but wouldn't that be nice! But it would take years to put all those units in the game.

I'd buy, especially if they actually read my feedbacks. But they do have their 'beta team' so why would they risk this on someone that may not realize it's a work in progress? Some people don't realize that no one ever has, or ever will, produced a complicated software program without buggs. The smallest program ever written, IEFBR14, a one line program, had to be modified!!!

That's what I figured. But I don't see why it would be more difficult than producing the betas. Just one line of code that restricts the scenario, campaign selection or whatever could be placed in the root program. Heck look at many of the games today, they're all demos until a few bug fixes come out!!! Anyway, I can wait. Thanks.

Again, I say good job on the range issue. Now a Tiger should be different than a T34 in this game.

I myself don't want, or need 'gore' to enjoy a 'thinking' game. It's just a waste of computing power better spent on the AI.

Wouldn't it be nice to get demos along the way during a games development? Sort of like beta releases. Think about the level of ownership a player would have thinking they may have influenced the direction of the project with some suggestion made during it's development. The user would have to realize it's a work in progress and be mature enough to overlook certain coding errors and such. But judging by the number of folks on message boards, there may be a untapped resource available to the developers (and free!!). You'll need a strong project leader that can be the 'commander-in-chief' and make the hard decisions of what goes and what stays and juggle that with the bean counters.

I am also pleased and was hoping it was just some testing that needed to be done.

MeatEtr: If it bleeds, we can kill it. I just upgraded the codecs because I only got the sound this morning. Since then, they moved the movie to worthdownloading.com and I was able to dl it and it runs fine. I can almost see the chiggers in the grass!!!

Heck no man, the shoe is on the other foot and now I get to be the stupid user that calls and asks questions that are 'in the manual'. HA, actually, the wording that Moon used made it sound like you needed to verify when running the game. Just wanted to make sure it was only during installation. Don't fret, IBM is much worse.

Great, thanks. To me that is an acceptable amount of hassle.

I'm afraid that inf unable to be in buildings may be a showstopper for serious wargamers. I find it kind of funny that you put so much 'energy' into being realistic in many areas, but decided to bypass in-building tactics. I thought you may even have an 'occupied' outhouse to assault!

So are you saying, that whenever you want to run (play) a game with elicense you have to be connected to the license site and have the elicense program running on my PC to start it?

I also think something needs adjusting. In my 1st game as the Axis, I virturally took Italy out of the war trying to keep the navy up to strength - just jacking around. It's too easy to lose naval points and too costly to replace them. I like the idea of a time cost as well as lower mpp costs.

Got my vote.